Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GOLD COAST MOTOR CARS, INC. DBA PERILLO BMW, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GOLD COAST MOTOR CARS, INC. DBA PERILLO BMW, INC. in 1025 N. CLARK STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60610 (NAICS 441110). OSHA activity number 342730207.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gold Coast Motor Cars, INC. DBA Perillo BMW, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gold Coast Motor Cars, INC. DBA Perillo BMW, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1025 N. CLARK STREET
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60610
Mailing
1025 N. CLARK STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60610
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
441110
Employees
133
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,989 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person which certified that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a) Automobile Service Center - On or about October 12, 2017, the employer did not verify through a written certification that a workplace hazard assessment was performed for employees assigned the task of filling customer's tires with air.  An employee not wearing eye protection was injured when a tire ruptured when being filled with compressed air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4989

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  a) Automobile Service Center - On or about October 12, 2017, the employer did not require an employee to wear safety glasses when filling a customer's tires with air.  This employee was injured when a tire ruptured when being filled with compressed air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342730207.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.