COLUMBUS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: VARGO
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VARGO in 2701 CHARTER ST, COLUMBUS, OH 43228 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 342732104.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VARGO
- Site address
- 2701 CHARTER ST
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43228
- Mailing
- 3709 PARKWAY LANE, HILLIARD, OH 43026
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 36
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,497 · Current $5,497
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section. Note: Exception: The employer need not document the required procedure for a particular machine or equipment, when all of the following elements exist: (1) The machine or equipment has no potential for stored or residual energy or reaccumulation of stored energy after shut down which could endanger employees; (2) the machine or equipment has a single energy source which can be readily identified and isolated; (3) the isolation and locking out of that energy source will completely deenergize and deactivate the machine or equipment; (4) the machine or equipment is isolated from that energy source and locked out during servicing or maintenance; (5) a single lockout device will achieve a locked-out condition; (6) the lockout device is under the exclusive control of the authorized employee performing the servicing or maintenance; (7) the servicing or maintenance does not create hazards for other employees; and (8) the employer, in utilizing this exception, has had no accidents involving the unexpected activation or reenergization of the machine or equipment during servicing or maintenance. a. At the Micro Center Distribution center, procedures were not documented for the control of hazardous energy when employees performed service and maintenance activities on the conveyor systems that had more than one energy source.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5497
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,297 · Current $3,297
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees. The training shall include the following: 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee shall receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control. a. The employer did not provide authorized employee training for all employees that performed maintenance and servicing work on conveyors at the Micro Center Distribution Center.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3297
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,497 · Current $5,497
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee shall affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device, group lockbox, or comparable mechanism when he or she begins work, and shall remove those devices when he or she stops working on the machine or equipment being serviced or maintained. a. At the Micro Center Distribution Center, each employee performing maintenance and repairs on a conveyor system did not affix a personal lock out device on the conveyor system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5497
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information. a. At the site, the employer did not train employees on the new label elements and safety data sheet format by December 1, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342732104.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.