IMPERIAL, MO —
OSHA Inspection: VENDTECH-SGI, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VENDTECH-SGI, LLC in 900 JEFFCO EXECUTIVE DR., IMPERIAL, MO 63052 (NAICS 561612). OSHA activity number 342738309.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Vendtech-Sgi, LLC — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vendtech-Sgi, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VENDTECH-SGI, LLC
- Site address
- 900 JEFFCO EXECUTIVE DR.
- City
- IMPERIAL
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63052
- Mailing
- 900 JEFFCO EXECUTIVE DR., IMPERIAL, MO 63052
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561612
- Employees
- 158
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
18 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.303 B07 IV
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $10,163 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): The employer did not ensure that there were no damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment, such as parts that are broken, bent, cut, or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial, Hallway, Below the Administrative Office window: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employer permits employees to use an electrical outlet with apparent electrical hazards. On 10/30/2017 employees were exposed to electrical hazards where they used electrical outlet with a broken ground pin lodged in the lower receptacle.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $10163
1910.1025 C01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees are permitted to work in the shooting range where personal exposure levels are greater than the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms of airborne lead per cubic meter of air. On 11/07//2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of airborne lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous levels of airborne lead where the employees are permitted to work in the range without knowing the air borne lead levels. On 11/07//2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of airborne lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employer did not conduct the required initial determination of airborne lead levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- May 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): The employer did not use engineering and/or work practice controls to reduce exposures to the lowest feasible level for any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year where engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were feasible but did not reduce the employees' exposure to or below the permissible exposure limit: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: The employer is exposing employees to hazardous airborne levels of lead where employees are permitted to work where there are no engineering or work practice controls to lower the exposure levels to below the air borne lead levels of 50.00 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employer did not implement engineering or work practice controls to reduce the exposure levels below the PEL.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 E02
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(2): Respiratory protection was not provided to supplement engineering and work practice controls, that did not control employees exposure to or below 50 micrograms per cubic meter: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. Employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided respiratory protection where the ventilation systems do not bring the lead levels to below 50 micrograms per cubic meter. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The ventilation systems did not bring the lead levels to below 50 micrograms per cubic meter and the employee was not provided respiratory protection to supplement the ineffective engineering controls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 E03 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- May 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided a written compliance program. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 E04 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i): When ventilation was used to control exposure to lead, measurements which demonstrate the effectiveness of the system in controlling exposure were not made, at least, every three months: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: The employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees are permitted to work where required measurements of the effectiveness of the ventilation used to control exposure to lead are not made. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employer did not perform the required measurements to demonstrate the effectiveness of the system, at least, every 3 months.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 G01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air are not provided appropriate protective work clothing. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not provided appropriate work clothing and equipment such as, but not limited to, coveralls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 I02 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous airborne lead levels where employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided clean change rooms. On or about 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted on 11/07/2017 by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The overexposed employee was not provided a clean change room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 I03 II
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(ii): Shower facilities, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.141(d)(3), were not provided for employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided shower facilities. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The overexposed employee was not provided shower facilities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 I03 III
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025 (i) (3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to shower per 29 CFR 1910.1025 (i) (3) (i) did not leave the workplace wearing any clothing or equipment worn during the work shift: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not prevented from leaving the workplace wearing any clothing worn during the work shift. On or about 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not required to change his clothing and did not change the clothing worn during the work shift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 I04 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- May 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025 (i) (4) (i): Lunchroom facilities were not provided for employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided lunch room facilities. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not provided lunchroom facilities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 I04 II
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- May 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025 (i) (4) (ii): Lunchroom facilities for employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not provided with a temperature controlled, positive pressure, filtered air supply: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided lunchroom facilities that are equipped with a temperature controlled, positive pressure, filtered air supply. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not provided lunch room facilities with a temperature controlled, positive pressure, filtered air supply.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 I04 III
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $6,485
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025 (i) (4) (iii): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to wash their hands and face prior to eating, drinking, smoking or applying cosmetics: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous airborne conditions. Employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not required to wash hands and face prior to eating and drinking. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not required to wash hands and face prior to drinking, eating, or smoking.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6485
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 J01 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more than thirty days per year: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided a medical surveillance program. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not provided a medical surveillance program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $6,413 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the contents of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead at any level are not informed of the contents of Appendices A and B of the lead standard. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. Similar personal air sampling of managerial personnel obtained an exposure level of 4 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The employees who used the facilities were exposed to airborne lead level at a minimum of 4 micrograms of airborne lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling of management personnel. An area sampling of the range captured airborne lead level of 300 micrograms of airborne lead per cubic meter of air. The employees were not provided required information on the contents of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6413
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.1025 L01 II
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees who are exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air are not provided required training. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. The employee was not provided required training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 M02 I
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(2)(i): Warning signs bearing the legend: WARNING, LEAD WORK AREA, POISON, NO SMOKING OR EATING, were not posted in each work area where the permissible exposure limit (PEL) was exceeded: 900 Jeffco Executive Drive, Imperial: Employer is exposing employees to hazardous conditions. The employees are permitted to work in an area where the exposure to lead exceeds the permissible level of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air without warning signs being displayed as required. On 11/07/2017 an employee who was the "trainer" was exposed to airborne lead at twice the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air as determined by personal air sampling conducted by OSHA. The exposure level obtained was 110 micrograms of air borne lead per cubic meter of air calculated on 8-hour time weighted average basis. Sampling was conducted for 306 minutes. Required warning signs where there is overexposure to airborne lead in the shooting range were not posted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561612)
Jul 13, 2026
Security Engineers, INC. · ROANOKE, AL
Jul 13, 2026
Lyons Security Services INC · SACRAMENTO, CA
Jul 8, 2026
Armorous Private Security · RICHMOND, CA
Jul 7, 2026
Allied Universal Security · HORIZON CITY, TX
Jun 25, 2026
161430 - Sunstates Security, LLC · DURHAM, NC
More inspections in MO
Jul 17, 2026
United Parcel Service · SAINT LOUIS, MO
Jul 15, 2026
Triple J Construction, LLC. · PLATTE CITY, MO
Jul 14, 2026
Torchylo Builders, LLC. · CLINTON, MO
Jul 13, 2026
Jorge Merida · BLUE SPRINGS, MO
Jul 9, 2026
Niagara Bottling · KANSAS CITY, MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342738309.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.