Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAY-TECH INFRARED CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAY-TECH INFRARED CORP. in 198 SPRINGFIELD ROAD, CHARLESTOWN, NH 03603 (NAICS 333999). OSHA activity number 342738895.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ray-Tech Infrared Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ray-Tech Infrared Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
198 SPRINGFIELD ROAD
City
CHARLESTOWN
State
NH
ZIP
03603
Mailing
PO BOX 1119, CHARLESTOWN, NH 03603
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333999
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of each workroom was not maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition.     Location: shop area         On or about 10/27/17, employees were exposed to slip hazards from a wet floor caused by the roof leaking in several places.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.94 C07 III B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
29 CFR 1910.94(c)(7)(iii)(b): A pressure gage marked to show the pressure drop across the filters of the spray booth to indicate that the filters require cleaning or replacement was not installed:  Location: paint spray room On or about 10/17/17, the employer exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards by failing to installing a gauge that will show pressure drop across filters to ensure filters were replaced or cleaned to ensure airflow through the booth.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $2,956
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   Location: paint booth On or about 10/27/17, the employer did not establish a respiratory program for employees required to wear a 3M half face respirator while working in paint spray booth.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Location: spray paint booth On or about 10/27/17, employees required to use a 3M half face respirator were not provided medical evaluations prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  Location: spray paint booth On or about 10/27/17, employees required to use a 3M half face respirator were not fit tested prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  Location: paint booth On or about 10/27/17, respirators were stored uncovered in chemical storage lockers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:    Location: paint booth On or about 10/27/17, the employer did not provide training on the use of respirators to employees who are required to use 3M half face respirator's.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Abate by
Feb 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  Location: production area On or about 10/27/17, employees were not protected from flying chips and sparks while using a Makita 14 inch chop saw with an abrasive blade to cut metal.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:  Location: production area On or about 10/27/17, an abrasive wheel used on a DeWalt portable grinder, which was being used in welding operations, was not provided with a safety guard meeting the requirements specified in 1910.243(c)(1) through (c)(4).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Ray-Tech Infrared Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342738895.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.