Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEPINO ENTERPRISES CORP.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of NEPINO ENTERPRISES CORP. in 121 MADISON AVENUE, MADISON, NJ 07940 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342740503.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nepino Enterprises Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nepino Enterprises Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
121 MADISON AVENUE
City
MADISON
State
NJ
ZIP
07940
Mailing
50 BENTON ROAD, PARAMUS, NJ 07652
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i):     Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:      a)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to electric shock as the extension cords used throughout the site were not plugged into a power source with GFCI protection.                                                                                            Violation observed on or about 10/26/2017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1700
  • — C (S) $2439
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.405 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2):     In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:    a)  121 Madison Avenue, in the Garage Area, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to electric shock as the outlet box providing power to extension cords was missing its cover.                                                                                             Violation observed on or about 10/26/2017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1700
  • — C (S) $2439
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,049 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv):     Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:      a)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to electric shock as the female end of the extension cord that was plugged into a portable GFCI device had several inches of strain showing.                                                                            Violation observed on or about 11/02/2017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1700
  • — C (S) $3049
  • — Z (S) $3049

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1):     Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:    a)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to electric shock as the power cord supplying the Makita circular saw was badly frayed.                                                                                                                                Violation observed on or about 11/02/2017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1700
  • — C (S) $2439
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii):     Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  Note:  29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(7) applies when the top edge of a stairrail system also serves as a handrail.    Instance a)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to falls of up to approximately 8' to the floor below as interior stairways were not equipped with stairrails.                                                                              Violation observed on or about 10/26/2017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1700
  • — C (S) $2439
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.1052 C12

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,049 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12):     Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926:  Note:  Guarding of landings for stairways and ladders are being maintained under Subpart M.    Instance a)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to falls of over 8' to the floor below as interior stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems.                                                                            Violation observed on or about 10/26/2017.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1700
  • — C (S) $3049
  • — Z (S) $3049

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,536 · Current $1,995 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Instance a)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employee was exposed to falls of 8' from the roof trusses to the second floor and to over 26' falls from roof trusses to the ground below as no methods of fall protection were in use.                                          Violation observed on or about 10/26/2017.    Instance b)  121 Madison Avenue, Madison, NJ.    Employees were exposed to falls of up to 18'8" from unguarded wall /window openings throughout the first and second floors of this residential structure.                                                 Violation observed on or about 10/26/2017.                        Nepino Enterprises Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 950234, citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on 01/22/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 103 Paramus Road, Paramus, NJ.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $1995
  • — C (R) $8536
  • — Z (R) $8536

View Nepino Enterprises Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342740503.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.