Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HACH COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HACH COMPANY in 5600 LINDBERGH DRIVE, LOVELAND, CO 80538 (NAICS 334516). OSHA activity number 342742517.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hach Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hach Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HACH COMPANY
Site address
5600 LINDBERGH DRIVE
City
LOVELAND
State
CO
ZIP
80538
Mailing
5600 LINDBERGH DRIVE, LOVELAND, CO 80538
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334516
Employees
950
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,712 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):  Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a)   Hach Company at 5600 Lindbergh Drive, Loveland, CO:  On and preceding 10/31/17, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from injury when the Hendrick vertical saw was used to cut small plastic pieces.  Operating the machine in this manner prevented the vertical blade guard, attached to the front of the machine, to sit flush with the work table, thus exposing the saw blade when cutting.  The front blade guard was being used to hold the plastic pieces to the vertical worktable.  This condition exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4712

1910.95 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, where employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response), or equivalently, a dose of fifty percent:    (a) Hach Company, at 5600 Lindbergh Drive, Loveland, CO:  On and preceding 10/31/17, the employer did not the administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, where employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response), or equivalently, a dose of fifty percent.  On 10/31/17, one employee operated a Henrich panel saw to cut plastic and a Cobra chop saw to cut aluminum was exposed to noise at a dose in excess of the fifty percent dose of the Action Level.  The employer performed noise monitoring by dosimetry on 9/13/17, and measured six projected doses:  11.7%, 44.2%, 48.0%, 55.4%, 78.6%, 89.1% of the TWA PEL.   The employer had not implemented a hearing conservation program.  This condition potentially exposed the employee to a hazardous noise dose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): While the employer did provide respirators at the request of employees and permitted employees to use their own respirators, the employer did not determine that such respirator use will not in itself create a hazard. If the employer did not determine that any voluntary respirator use is permissible, the employer did not provide the respirator users with the information contained in Appendix D to this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard");   (a) Hach Company, at 5600 Lindbergh Drive, Loveland, CO:  On and preceding 10/31/17, the employer did not ensure that the employees voluntarily using a respirator in the saw room and while using the Henrich panel saw to cut plastic blanks were medically able to use that respirator and that the respirator was cleaned, stored and maintained so its use did not present a health hazard to the employee.  The employer did not provide a copy of Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 to employees voluntarily wearing respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Hach Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342742517.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.