FORT LAUDERDALE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: LEADER D.O.T. SERVICES, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LEADER D.O.T. SERVICES, INC. in 1580 SE 26TH STREET, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 342752904.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEADER D.O.T. SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 1580 SE 26TH STREET
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33316
- Mailing
- 1882 SW EFFLAND AVENUE, PORT SAINT LUCIE, FL 34953
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement a written Permit Space program, wherein an employee entered the compartments of a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, for the purpose of cleaning/repairing/inspecting the tank compartments, during which the four fuel compartments of the tanker, which had previous contained unleaded gasoline, had not been adequately flushed/purged in accordance with an industry recognized procedure, therefore exposing the employee to potentially hazardous atmospheres. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2522
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.146 C05
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5): The employer did not ensure that the alternate procedures specified in paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section were met, prior to entering a permit space under the conditions set forth in paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this section: On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement an Alternate Procedure for Permit Spaces, wherein an employee entered the compartments of a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, for the purpose of cleaning/repairing/inspecting the tank compartments, during which the four fuel compartments of the tanker, which had previous contained unleaded gasoline, had not been adequately flushed/purged in accordance with an industry recognized procedure, therefore exposing the employee to potentially hazardous atmospheres. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.146 C05 II C
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(C): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i) but before an employee entered the space, the internal atmosphere was not tested with a calibrated direct-reading instrument: On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee entered the compartments of a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, for the purpose of cleaning/repairing/inspecting the tank compartments, wherein the four fuel compartments of the tanker, which had previous contained unleaded gasoline, had not been adequately flushed/purged; during which the employer did not adequately/correctly test the atmosphere with a calibrated direct-reading instrument within the four fuel tank compartments for the presence of an explosive atmosphere and/or any other hazardous atmosphere before making entry into, nor periodically while working inside the tanker compartments, therefore exposing the employee to potentially hazardous atmospheres. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2522
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.146 C05 II F
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(F): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i) but the atmosphere within space was not periodically tested to ensure that the continuous forced air ventilation was preventing the accumulation of a hazardous atmosphere: On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee entered the compartments of a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, for the purpose of cleaning/repairing/inspecting the tank compartments, wherein the four fuel compartments of the tanker, which had previous contained unleaded gasoline, had not been adequately flushed/purged; during which the employer did not adequately/correctly test the atmosphere with a calibrated direct-reading instrument within the four fuel tank compartments for the presence of an explosive atmosphere and/or any other hazardous atmosphere before making entry into, nor periodically while working inside the tanker compartments, therefore exposing the employee to potentially hazardous atmospheres. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee entered the compartments of a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, for the purpose of cleaning/repairing/inspecting the tank compartments, wherein the employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146, therefore exposing the employee to potentially hazardous atmospheres. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2522
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.252 A02 VI C
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(vi)(C): Cutting or welding was permitted in the presence of explosive atmospheres (mixture of flammable gases, vapors, liquids, or dusts with air), or explosive atmospheres that could develop inside uncleaned or improperly prepared tanks or equipment which had previously contained such materials, or that could develop in areas with an accumulation of combustible dusts: On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was using an an oxygen-acetylene torch/performing permit hot-work to heat/loosen/remove the valve mounting studs/bolts from a belly-valve flange on a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, wherein the four fuel compartments of the tanker, had not been adequately flushed/purged, so as to remove the explosive atmosphere within the fuel compartments, nor did the employer adequately/correctly test the atmosphere in the fuel tank compartments for the presence of an explosive atmosphere before beginning the use, and/or during the use of the oxygen-acetylene torch, which resulted in a fire/explosion and subsequent serious injury to the employee using the oxygen-acetylene torch, and also exposing the other two employees working on the tanker/in the immediate work area to fire/explosion type hazards. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2522
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.252 B03
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132:(a): On or about November 03, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was using an oxygen-acetylene torch/performing permit hot-work to heat/loosen/remove the valve mounting studs/bolts from a belly-valve flange on a 9, 500 gallon fuel tanker truck, wherein the four fuel compartments of the tanker had not been adequately flushed/purged in preparation for a welding/cutting type operation, which resulted in a fire/explosion, during which the employee who was using the oxygen-acetylene torch was not wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriate for the nature and location of the work performed, which subsequently resulted in serious injury to the employee using the oxygen-acetylene torch, and also exposing the other two employees working on the tanker/in the immediate work area to fire/explosion type hazards. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2522
- · Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342752904.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.