BROOKFIELD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: SKELMORLIE, LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SKELMORLIE, LLC in 777 FEDERAL RD., BROOKFIELD, CT 06804 (NAICS 561790). OSHA activity number 342767951.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SKELMORLIE, LLC
- Site address
- 777 FEDERAL RD.
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06804
- Mailing
- 705 NORTH MOUNTAIN RD. SUITE G-105, NEWINGTON, CT 06111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561790
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use. Worksite: The employer did not establish and implement a written respirator protection program where an employee was required to wear a respirator while dry cutting asphalt and concrete with a gas powered demolition saw.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2662.1
- · Z (S) $3803
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to use a half facepiece cartridge type respirator was medically evaluated prior to the employee was fit tested or required to use the a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to use a half facepiece cartridge type respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary (Construction Reference 1926.103). Worksite: The employer did not provide comprehensive and understandable training to the employee who was required to use a half facepiece cartridge respirator while dry cutting asphalt and concrete with a gas powered demolition saw.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section. Worksite: The employer did not assess the exposure level of each employees who was reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica while dry cutting asphalt and concrete with a gas powered demolition saw.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2662.1
- · Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561790)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342767951.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.