LEETSDALE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: BOB SUMEREL TIRE CO.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BOB SUMEREL TIRE CO. in 55 LEETSDALE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, LEETSDALE, PA 15056 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 342779097.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOB SUMEREL TIRE CO.
- Site address
- 55 LEETSDALE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
- City
- LEETSDALE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15056
- Mailing
- 55 LEETSDALE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, LEETSDALE, PA 15056
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811198
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 B10
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,282 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(10): The employer did not ensure any ladder with structural or other defects was immediately tagged "Dangerous: Do Not Use" or with similar language in accordance with �1910.145 and removed from service until repaired in accordance with �1910.22(d), or replaced: a) Worksite, on or about November 16, 2017 - The employer did not remove from service the portable metal Cotterman 12-ft ladder that was damaged and should not have been in service but was used to access the upper shelves of the storage unit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $6282
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $10,000 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent: a) In the Re-Tread Area, on or about February 6, 2018 - A retread laborer who operated buffer equipment was exposed to continuous noise at 71.63% of the permissible daily dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 90dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 87.5 dBA during the 342-minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for 30 minutes for lunch. b) In the Re-Tread Area, on or about February 6, 2018 - A retread laborer who operated mounter equipment was exposed to continuous noise at 78.26% of the permissible daily dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 90dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 88.2 dBA during the 406-minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for 30 minutes for lunch. The employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $10000
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicates that any employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) In the Re-Tread Area, on or about February 6, 2018 - A retread laborer who operated buffer equipment was exposed to continuous noise at 71.63% of the permissible daily dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 90dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 87.5 dBA during the 342-minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for 30 minutes for lunch. b) In the Re-Tread Area, on or about February 6, 2018 - A retread laborer who operated mounter equipment was exposed to continuous noise at 78.26% of the permissible daily dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 90dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 88.2 dBA during the 406-minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for 30 minutes for lunch. The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: a) Worksite, on or about November 16, 2017 - The employer did not maintain a written and certified hazard assessment for appropriate personal protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be meet: a) Worksite, on or about November 16, 2017 - The written hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information was not maintained at the Leetsdale Plant.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with either the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers; or product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof: a) Worksite, on or about November 16, 2017 - The container of Bandag Universal Cement, a flammable which contained heptane, carbon black, and hydro treated heavy naphthenic petroleum distillates, used to repair and seal retread tires was not marked with its name and appropriate hazardous warnings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- May 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used: a) Worksite, on or about November 16, 2017 - The employer did not maintain a SDS sheet for the New Look tire paint, which contained carbon black, and ethylene glycol monobutyl ether or Bandag cement, a flammable which contained heptane, carbon black, and hydrotreated heavy naphthenic petroleum distillates used during tire retread operations at the Leetsdale Plant.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811198)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342779097.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.