APPLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BOELTER RESTORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BOELTER RESTORATION in W5775 PARKER CT., APPLETON, WI 54915 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342782034.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOELTER RESTORATION
- Site address
- W5775 PARKER CT.
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54915
- Mailing
- 410 MILL ST., WAUPACA, WI 54981
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a. The employer failed to provide abatement certification related to the means and methods used to abate the residential fall protection violation issued on December 13, 2017.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,847 · Current $1,847
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or about November 20, 2017, an employee was not protected by conventional fall protection methods while working on the roof of a recently constructed single family residence located at W5775 Parker Ct. Appleton, WI 54915. The employee was exposed falls of approximately ten feet while bringing materials to the company owner.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1847
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342782034.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.