PASADENA, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: SIMMONS FABRICATORS, LTD
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SIMMONS FABRICATORS, LTD in 2415 BEVERLY RD, PASADENA, TX 77502 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 342793056.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SIMMONS FABRICATORS, LTD
- Site address
- 2415 BEVERLY RD
- City
- PASADENA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77502
- Mailing
- 2415 BEVERLY RD, PASADENA, TX 77502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) At the site, where employees wearing elastomeric respirators while performing welding and cutting tasks were not medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2217
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) At the site, where the employer did not establish a written respiratory program for employees that voluntarily wear elastomeric respirators while performing welding and cutting tasks.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) At the site, where the employer did not estimate employee exposure to copper, iron oxide, and manganese while welding.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1848
- · Z (S) $3696
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): a) At the site, where the employer did not determine the employee exposure level to hexavalent chromium.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.179 G01 V
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control box(es) were not constructed to prevent electrical shock: a) In the small fabrication shop, the top button on the Demac pendant control box was not maintained in a condition to prevent electrical shock in that the cover of the button was missing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1478
- · Z (S) $2956
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,434 · Current $2,217 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation: a) In the big fabrication shop, where the AccurPress press brake #740012 was not equipped with machine guarding in the rear and in the front of the machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2217
- · Z (S) $4434
1910.252 B02 I B
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(i)(B): Goggles or other suitable eye protection were not used during all gas welding or oxygen cutting operations: a) In the small fabrication shop, where the employer did not ensure suitable eye protection was used during gas welding activities.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1848
- · Z (S) $3696
1910.252 B02 II A
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(ii)(A): Helmets, shields, and goggles being used were readily flammable: a) In the big fabrication shop, where welding helmets used to perform welding tasks were flammable.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1478
- · Z (S) $2956
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $415 · Current $208 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) At the facility, where the employer did not certify that the forklift operators had been trained and evaluated to operate the forklifts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $208
- · Z (O) $415
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $415 · Current $208 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: a) At the facility, where the employer did not maintain a safety data sheet for propylene compressed gas.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $208
- · Z (O) $415
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342793056.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.