Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO GARCES MARIN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FERNANDO GARCES MARIN in 11040 TWENTY MILE ROAD, PARKER, CO 80134 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342795267.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fernando Garces Marin — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fernando Garces Marin is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11040 TWENTY MILE ROAD
City
PARKER
State
CO
ZIP
80134
Mailing
2322 MARSHES GLEN COURT, NORCROSS, GA 30071
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:      a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical shock for a flexible cord used at the job site. The plug of the flexible cord was not provided with strain relief and was used to provide power to the air compressor unit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $815
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):      a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were working on scaffold systems were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet. The scaffold systems were not fully planked on the third level of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:      a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were working on a scaffold system and exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet. A ladder system was not provided for the employees to access and egress the upper levels of the scaffold system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:      a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, A foreman and three workers were working on a scaffold system and exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet. Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides of the scaffold system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were working on a scaffold system and exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet. A competent person did not ensure that the scaffold was inspected for visible defects before each work shift. The scaffold system was not fully planked on the third level, a ladder system was not provided for the employees to access and egress the upper levels of the scaffold system; and guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:   a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were working on a scaffold system and exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet. The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was erected or altered by trained and experienced employees. The scaffold system was not fully planked on the third level, a ladder system was not provided for the employees to access and egress the upper levels of the scaffold system; and guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:   a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were working on a scaffold system and exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet. The workers on the job site were not trained by a qualified person to recognize the hazards associated with the scaffold system. The scaffold system was not fully planked on the third level, a ladder system was not provided for the employees to access and egress the upper levels of the scaffold system; and guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):      a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a worker was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet while working on the first level roof of a two-story residential house. The worker was not protected with a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 feet while using an A-frame ladder to access and egress the first level of the scaffold system. The side rails of the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet on the landing surface of the scaffold system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $815
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:   a) On or about November 15, 2017 and at times prior, a foreman and three workers were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 feet while using an A-frame ladder to access and egress the upper level of the scaffold system. The rungs of the A-frame ladder were not opened or extended and were placed diagonally on the side of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342795267.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.