Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AUTOBODY PRODUCTS INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AUTOBODY PRODUCTS INC. in 6150 GLADYS STREET, RAVENNA, OH 44266 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 342802865.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Autobody Products INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Autobody Products INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6150 GLADYS STREET
City
RAVENNA
State
OH
ZIP
44266
Mailing
133 SOUTH MONROE STREET, BUTLER, PA 16001
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $3,178 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    On or about December 1, 2017, the employer did not provide initial and annual training for portable fire extinguishers when available for employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3178
  • — Z (S) $4889

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,519 · Current $4,237 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about December 1, 2017, the employer had not trained or evaluated employees who drive powered industrial trucks on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4237
  • — Z (S) $6519

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition.    On or about December 1, 2017, the employer did not remove from service the Yale propane forklift (SN#N434054). The forklift is jump-started before each use due to a bad battery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    On or about December 1, 2017, the workplace hazard assessment was not put in writing, dated, and signed by the person who had completed the hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  On or about December 1, 2017, the employer did not provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals on the details of the new hazard communication standard which encompasses the Global Harmonization System (GHS).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342802865.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.