FREEPORT, ME —
OSHA Inspection: CURTIS ROOFING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CURTIS ROOFING LLC in 45 MAIN STREET, FREEPORT, ME 04032 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342816964.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CURTIS ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 45 MAIN STREET
- City
- FREEPORT
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04032
- Mailing
- 16 MERT DRIVE, FREEPORT, ME 04032
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,738 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Job Site - An employee who was working on the ground and exposed to head injuries from possible falling roofing debris, tools and/or materials was not protected by the use of a hard hat.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1738.4
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Job Site - Employees working on a steep sloped roof, approximately 17' above the ground were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2172.8
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Job Site - The ladder used to gain access to the roof did not extend 3 feet beyond the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2172.8
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342816964.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.