Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AFASSCO, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AFASSCO, INC. in 228 W. CHESTNUT, ORRVILLE, OH 44667 (NAICS 423450). OSHA activity number 342821337.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Afassco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Afassco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AFASSCO, INC.
Site address
228 W. CHESTNUT
City
ORRVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
44667
Mailing
228 W. CHESTNUT, ORRVILLE, OH 44667
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423450
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,175 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    a. On or about December 11, 2017, a pallet of materials and an out-of-service forklift were observed to obstruct an exit route. The distance between the two items was measured to be approximately 15 inches.    b. On or about December 11, 2017, one of the exit doors in the back portion of the warehouse was caulked shut and unable to be opened.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1175
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,175 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    On or about December 11, 2017, one of the exit doors in the back section of the warehouse was not clearly marked by a sign reading "Exit". The sign had been removed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1175
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.37 B06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color:  On or about December 11, 2017, the exit signs in the back part of the warehouse were not illuminated by a reliable light source. The lightbulbs had been removed in order to procure replacement bulbs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,175 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1): The employer was not responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:     On or about December 11, 2017, employees were expected to utilize fire extinguishers throughout the facility in the case of an incipient stage fire. The employer failed to maintain and regularly inspect portable fire extinguishers throughout the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1175
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about December 11, 2017, employees were expected to utilize fire extinguishers throughout the facility in the case of an incipient stage fire. The employer failed to provide training to familiarize employees with general principles of fire extinguisher use at the time of initial employment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about December 11, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees operating a Hyster S50XM fork lift were competent to operate the vehicle safely. No training had been conducted prior to use of the fork lift by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, and shall not be placed in service if the examination shows any condition adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. Such examination shall be made at least daily:  On or about December 11, 2017, the Hyster S50XM fork lift was not examined daily before being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,175 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about December 11, 2017, employees were exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) when changing the tanks on the fork lifts. No written hazard communication program had been developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1175
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about December 11, 2017, employees were exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) when changing the tanks on the fork lifts. Employees were not trained on the hazards of the chemicals in their work area at the time of initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.32 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Jan 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $724 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(1):  At the end of each calender year the employer did not review its OSHA 300 log to verify that the entries were complete and accurate:    On or about December 11, 2017, the employer failed to review and verify the entries on the 2016 OSHA 300 log. One injury was listed on the log.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $724

View Afassco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342821337.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.