Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAF ELECTRONIC HARDWARE, INC. DIVISION OF MW INDUSTRIES, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RAF ELECTRONIC HARDWARE, INC. DIVISION OF MW INDUSTRIES, INC. in 95 SILVERMINE ROAD, SEYMOUR, CT 06483 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 342822012.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RAF Electronic Hardware, INC. Division of MW Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RAF Electronic Hardware, INC. Division of MW Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
95 SILVERMINE ROAD
City
SEYMOUR
State
CT
ZIP
06483
Mailing
95 SILVERMINE ROAD, SEYMOUR, CT 06483
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
134
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Abate by
Feb 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $10,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    WORKSHOP:  The point-of-operation of the NEFF No. 3 hydraulic/pneumatic power press was not guarded by appropriate barrier guards or devices.    On or about  00/00/2017, the operator of the above machine was able to place a hand into the point-of-operation to re-positioned/re-adjusted (tasks) the rectangle aluminum part, No. 8522-632-A, for the handle, and while the operator was trying to do the tasks, the press was activated, resulting a finger tip amputation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10000
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.305 G01 II H

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Abate by
Feb 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,130 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(ii)(H): Flexible cords and cables may be used only for prevention of the transmission of noise and vibration:   WORKSHOP: The flexible cord was used to supply power for the NEFF No.3 hydraulic/pneumatic press which was not a portable equipment and was not generating noise and/or vibration.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8130

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $10,163 · Current $5,080 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not reported to OSHA within 24 hours of the finger amputation incident occurred on December 04, 2017 while an employee was operating the NEFF No.3 hydraulic/pneumatic power press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5080
  • — Z (O) $10163

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342822012.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.