Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: R&J SERVICES AND PAINTING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R&J SERVICES AND PAINTING LLC in 305 N. POMPANO BEACH BLVD, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33062 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342835923.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R&J Services and Painting LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R&J Services and Painting LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
305 N. POMPANO BEACH BLVD
City
POMPANO BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33062
Mailing
2750 NE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE, JENSEN BEACH, FL 34957
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
8
Ownership type
B

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while operating a suspended scaffold that was not inspected prior to being used, to renovate the exterior walls of an existing high-rise apartment building.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working from a suspended scaffold that was not erected, moved, dismantled and altered by experienced and trained employees.   NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 D12 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(12)(ii): Wire rope clips used on suspension scaffold ropes were not installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations:  On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while renovating the exterior walls of an existing high-rise apartment building from a suspension scaffold that did not have its outrigger tieback clips (fist-grips) inspected, installed and torqued to the manufacturers specifications.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:  On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees who were not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system, were exposed to a fall hazard while renovating the exterior walls of an existing high-rise apartment building from a suspension scaffold.      NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not train each employee who performed work from a suspension scaffold to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in in question:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not train employees who were involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, and/or inspecting a suspension scaffold, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems were exposed to a fall hazard while erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a suspension scaffold(s) from a rooftop of an existing high-rise apartment building, exposing the employees to a fall hazards.     NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(9): Lanyards and/or vertical lifelines did not have a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN):    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees in a suspension scaffold were exposed to a fall hazard while using personal fall arrest systems with lifelines that were tied-off with knots, to an anchor point, and were abraded and weather damaged.               NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working from a suspension scaffold with the use of personal fall arrest systems that were rigged such that during a fall the worker would free fall more than 6-feet and contact the lower level.      NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not train employees who used personal fall arrest systems from a suspension scaffold to recognize the hazards of falling and in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize fall hazards.      NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D20

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $218 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(20): The employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a fall or did not assure that employees were able to rescue themselves:    On or about December 15, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold, for the purpose of renovating the exterior walls on all sides of an existing high-rise apartment building, while using Personal Fall Arrest Systems, during which the employer did not provide a written plan for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a suspended-fall, nor did the employer assure that employees were able to rescue themselves in the event of a suspended-fall, therefore exposing the employees to fall hazards/post-fall injuries resulting from a suspended fall.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $218
  • — Z (O) $311

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342835923.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.