RIDGEFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ALL SEASONS TREE CARE, LLC
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of ALL SEASONS TREE CARE, LLC in 90 SAINT JOHNS ROAD, RIDGEFIELD, CT 06877 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 342839602.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALL SEASONS TREE CARE, LLC
- Site address
- 90 SAINT JOHNS ROAD
- City
- RIDGEFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06877
- Mailing
- 37 PUTNAM PARK ROAD, REDDING, CT 06896
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- May 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided as necessary by reason of chemical hazards encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees operating chainsaws to cut fallen branches of trees were not provided with cut-resistant leg protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1630
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not conduct Workplace Hazard Assessment determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1340
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- May 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee required to use Personal Protective Equipment that covered when PPE is necessary, what PPE is necessary, how to don, doff, adjust and wear PPE, the limitations of PPE and the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not trained in the Workplace Hazard Assessment pertaining to the use and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.140 D02 II
- Issued
- May 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.140(d)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems were rigged in such a manner that the employee cannot free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) or contact a lower level. ESTABLISHMENT: The personal fall arrest system/device worn by the employee operating the truck mounted aerial lift from the basket was not an appropriated type and rigged in such a manner to prevent a free fall more than 6 feet or contact a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1630
- — Z (S) $2772
1904.39 A01
- Issued
- May 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(1): Within eight (8) hours after the death of any employee as a result of a work-related incident, the employer did not report the fatality to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not report the death of an employee as a result of a work-related incident to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor within eight (8) hours.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3000
- — Z (O) $5000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342839602.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.