Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: SOMERVILLE AUTO CENTER

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOMERVILLE AUTO CENTER in 193 SOMERVILLE AVE., SOMERVILLE, MA 02143 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 342846540.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Somerville Auto Center for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Somerville Auto Center is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
193 SOMERVILLE AVE.
City
SOMERVILLE
State
MA
ZIP
02143
Mailing
193 SOMERVILLE AVE., SOMERVILLE, MA 02143
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $832 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Location -  shop  On or about December 15, 2017, employer did not ensure that employee required to wear respirator are medically evaluated to prevent injury. Employee wore Powered Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR) without being medically evaluated for working with chemical hazards, such as , but not limited to acetone, n-butyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, toluene, and xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $831.5
  • · Z (S) $1663

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2018
Abate by
Feb 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $832 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) labeling, (g) safety data sheets, and (h) training will be met:  Location - shop  On or about December 15, 2017, a written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented where products such as acetone, paint, and primer (contains acetone, n-butyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, toluene, and xylene) were used.    Elements of a Written Hazard Communication Program Include:  1. Labeling of chemical containers 2. Maintaining safety data sheets 3. Providing training and information
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $831.5
  • · Z (S) $1663

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2018
Abate by
Feb 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $156 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Location - Shop  On or about December 15, 2017, employer has not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program for employee required to wear respirator for working with chemical hazards, but not limited to acetone, n-butyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, toluene, and xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $155.5
  • · Z (O) $311

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2018
Abate by
Mar 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  Location - Shop  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer had not performed an evaluation or identification of respiratory hazards for chemical hazards, such as , but not limited to acetone, n-butyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, toluene, and xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2018
Abate by
Feb 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  Location  - Shop  On or about December 15, 2017, employer did not provide information and training on proper use and care of respirator where production employee was wearing Powered Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR) for working with chemical hazards, such as , but not limited to acetone, n-butyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, toluene, and xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342846540.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.