MIDDLETOWN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: AK STEEL CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AK STEEL CORPORATION in 1801 CRAWFORD STREET, MIDDLETOWN, OH 45043 (NAICS 331111). OSHA activity number 342852332.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AK STEEL CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1801 CRAWFORD STREET
- City
- MIDDLETOWN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45043
- Mailing
- 1801 CRAWFORD STREET, MIDDLETOWN, OH 45043
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331111
- Employees
- 1700
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: On or about 12/22/17, employees were exposed to steam while working on the #9 Hearth Roll and the employer did not ensure that employees used adequate personal protective equipment in that employees' arms and trunk were not protected from exposure to steam.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: On or about 12/22/17, employees were exposed to steam while working on the #9 Hearth Roll and the employer did not ensure that employees used adequate protective face equipment in that employees faces were not protected from exposure to steam.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. Procedure 1335 did not clearly specify the order of the cooling line removal in that the procedures did not address removing the inlet line before the outlet line and did not address locking out the water inlet valve.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 C04 II D
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control. The procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing water-cooled hearth rolls to determine if water which is capable of producing 3rd degree steam burns had been removed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 I C
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C): Where lockout was used for energy control, the periodic inspection did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected: The employer's inspection of energy control procedures was not adequate in that the inspections did not include a review between the inspector and each authorized employee of the procedures being inspected.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: The employer did not certify that a periodic inspections of procedures such as but not limited to procedures 108, 1087, 1195, 1198, 1335, 1355, 1654, 5725, and 6114 had occurred.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,638 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: On or about 12/22/17, employees were exposed to steam while working on the #9 Hearth Roll and the employer did not ensure that authorized employees affixed a lock to the cooling water inlet valve prior to work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $8638
1910.147 D05 I
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(5)(i): All potentially hazardous stored or residual energy was not relieved, disconnected, restrained or otherwise rendered safe after the application of lockout or tagout devices to energy isolating devices: On or about 12/22/2017, employees were exposed to steam while working on the #9 Hearth Roll and the employer did not ensure that employees eliminated the potential for steam generation in the roll in that when the roll was turned steam was released.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished. On or about 12/22/2017, employees were exposed to steam while working on the #9 Hearth Roll and the employer did not ensure that employees verified that isolation and deenergization of the "steam out" had occurred prior to performing maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at AK Steel Corporation
View AK Steel Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331111)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342852332.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.