SUMTERVILLE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: HIGHWAY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HIGHWAY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED in 1749 CR 525 EAST, SUMTERVILLE, FL 33585 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 342864238.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HIGHWAY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 1749 CR 525 EAST
- City
- SUMTERVILLE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33585
- Mailing
- 1749 CR 525 EAST, SUMTERVILLE, FL 33585
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,123 · Current $2,474 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a rotating saw blade, in that, 24 inches of the non-cutting portion of the DO-ALL vertical band saw was not provided with a guard to enclose the blade, on or about 01/05/2018. b. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a rotating saw blade, in that, 14 inches of the non-cutting portion of the Hydmech horizontal band saw was not provided with a guard to enclose the blade, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2473.8
- — Z (S) $4123
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,850 · Current $2,910 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards, in that, the point of operation of a foot pedal operated 90 ton Cincinnati press brake was not provided with a guard, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2910
- — Z (S) $4850
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,910 · Current $1,746 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard, in that, the work rest of the Northern Industrial 8 inch pedestal grinder was 1 inch from the grinding wheel, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1746
- — Z (S) $2910
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard, in that, a tongue guard was not provided on the Northern Industrial 8 inch pedestal grinder, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used: a. At the fabrication areas where welding is conducted, employees adjacent to welding or walking by the welding areas were not protected either by wearing protective eyewear or by having shields or screens enclosing the welding stations, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a. At the manufacturing areas, a personal protective equipment hazard assessment was not conducted to address the following: 1. Selection and use of personal protective equipment that would adequately protect employees. 2. Communicating selection decision to each affected employee. 3. Selecting the personal protective equipment that properly fits each employee. On or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a. Prefabrication welding manufacturing area, employees were exposed to the hazard of inadvertent energization or release of stored energy during maintenance operations on equipment such as, but not limited to, vertical and horizontal band saws, Geka Hydrocrop 110 ironworker, Cincinnati 90 ton press brake and Hypertherm burn table plasma cutter. Equipment specific lockout/tagout procedures were not developed and implemented to include at a minimum the following: 1. A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure. 2. Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking, and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. 3. Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them. 4. Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices and other energy control measures. 5. The magnitude of hazardous energy. On or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: a. At the facility, portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected monthly as required to assure their ongoing integrity, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a. Break alarm area, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, an extension cord was used in place of fixed wiring and was run on the building wall behind wooden panels and was used to provide power to the buzzard alarm, on or about 01/05/2018. b. West wall of the prefabrication area, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, a red extension cord was used to provide power to a multi-outlet power strip located on a working bench, on or about 01/05/2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342864238.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.