Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ADVANCED LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY in 122 LEESLEY LANE, ARGYLE, TX 76226 (NAICS 335122). OSHA activity number 342868916.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Lightning Technology — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Lightning Technology is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
122 LEESLEY LANE
City
ARGYLE
State
TX
ZIP
76226
Mailing
122 LEESLEY LANE, ARGYLE, TX 76226
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
335122
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:  (i)   Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment;  (ii)  Communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and, (iii)  Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.    The employer failed to assess the hazards in the workplace and to select the correct personal protective equipment what properly fits the employees, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.   The employer did not ensure the Hardinge Lathe located in the production department was guarded to protect employees from rotating parts, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5432.4
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.145 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $726 · Current $436 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(2)(i): Caution signs were not used to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices:   The employer failed to inform the employees working in the Production department with signage in/on and around the lathes informing the operators of the hazards, exposing the employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $435.6
  • — Z (O) $726

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342868916.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.