ARGYLE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ADVANCED LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY in 122 LEESLEY LANE, ARGYLE, TX 76226 (NAICS 335122). OSHA activity number 342868916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADVANCED LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY
- Site address
- 122 LEESLEY LANE
- City
- ARGYLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76226
- Mailing
- 122 LEESLEY LANE, ARGYLE, TX 76226
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335122
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Abate by
- May 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: (i) Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; (ii) Communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and, (iii) Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. The employer failed to assess the hazards in the workplace and to select the correct personal protective equipment what properly fits the employees, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880.2
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. The employer did not ensure the Hardinge Lathe located in the production department was guarded to protect employees from rotating parts, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5432.4
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.145 C02 I
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $726 · Current $436 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(2)(i): Caution signs were not used to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices: The employer failed to inform the employees working in the Production department with signage in/on and around the lathes informing the operators of the hazards, exposing the employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $435.6
- — Z (O) $726
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335122)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342868916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.