Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS INZUNZA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS INZUNZA in 2002 FLAGSTONE DRIVE, MADISON, AL 35758 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342871241.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Inzunza — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Inzunza is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS INZUNZA
Site address
2002 FLAGSTONE DRIVE
City
MADISON
State
AL
ZIP
35758
Mailing
4366 CLOUDBURST ROAD, MEMPHIS, TN 38141
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1926.28(a): Appropriate personal protective equipment was not worn by employee(s) in all operations where there was exposure to hazardous conditions:  (a) On or about 01/09/18 - 2002 Flagstone Drive, Madison, AL, employees operated a HITACHI pneumatic nail gun without wearing the eye protection provided by the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) On or about 01/09/18 - 2002 Flagstone Drive, Madison, Alabama, an employee installing siding at approximately 18 feet, 7 inches above the ground was not protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2018
Abate by
Mar 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) On or about 01/09/18 - 2002 Flagstone Drive, Madison, Alabama, fall protection training had not been provided for employees exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet, 7 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342871241.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.