HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JACK IN THE BOX, INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JACK IN THE BOX, INC in 6060 LONG DR, HOUSTON, TX 77087 (NAICS 722513). OSHA activity number 342872611.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JACK IN THE BOX, INC
- Site address
- 6060 LONG DR
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77087
- Mailing
- 9330 BALBOA AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722513
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,652 · Current $3,049 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) At the worksite, where the employer did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan for employees potentially exposed to blood and/or Other Potentially Infectious Materials (OPIM) when rendering first aid and cleaning up blood.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3049
- — C (S) $6652
- — Z (S) $6652
1910.1030 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer did not conduct an exposure determination: a) At the worksite, where an exposure determination was not conducted for employees potentially exposed to blood and/or OPIM when rendering first aid and cleaning up blood.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not train each employee with occupational exposure: a) At the worksite, where the employer did not provide training in accordance with 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A) through 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(N) to employees potentially exposed to blood and/or OPIM when rendering first aid and cleaning up blood.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 F01 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,652 · Current $3,049 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure: a) At the worksite, where the employer did not offer the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to employees who are potentially exposed to blood and/or OPIM when rendering first aid and cleaning up blood.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3049
- — C (S) $6652
- — Z (S) $6652
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,988 · Current $3,049 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) At the worksite, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program. Employees use hazardous substances such as Absolute Basin and Bowl Cleaner, which contains Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3049
- — C (S) $4988
- — Z (S) $4988
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment: a)At the worksite, where employees had not received effective hazard communication information and training. Employees use hazardous chemicals such as Absolute Basin and Bowl Cleaner, which contains Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 H01 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(i): The employer did not establish and maintain an accurate record for each employee with occupational exposure: a) At the worksite, where the employer did not establish and maintain records of training and HBV status for employees potentially exposed to blood and/or OPIM when rendering first aid and cleaning up blood.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Jack in the BOX, INC
View Jack in the BOX, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722513)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342872611.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.