Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ACCURATE AUTOMATIC MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ACCURATE AUTOMATIC MANUFACTURING CORPORATION in 703 BUSINESS WAY, WYLIE, TX 75098 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 342877867.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Accurate Automatic Manufacturing Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Accurate Automatic Manufacturing Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
703 BUSINESS WAY
City
WYLIE
State
TX
ZIP
75098
Mailing
703 BUSINESS WAY, WYLIE, TX 75098
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

17 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $4,527 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:     In the warehouse employees were exposed to being struck-by and/or crushed by falling objects caused by:     (a) Storage racks not being anchored to the ground.     (b) The storage rack system did not have plaques containing the maximum permissible unit load and/or maximum permissible unit load and/or maximum uniformly distributed load per level, and/or the racking system did  not have maximum load per bay.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4527
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.    (a) Secondary Department, an employee wore prescription lenses that were not ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 approved eye protection while working on a drill press machine exposing the employee to  flying metal objects.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     (a) Machine Shop, throughout the manufacturing area, procedures were not developed for the control of hazardous energy for the employer's machines and equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6467
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.147 C05 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s)    (a) Machine Shop, Secondary Department, Hardinge horizontal lathe machine, a lockout device was utilized and did not indicate the identity of the employee who was applying the device. Employees were exposed to the release of hazardous energy.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:    (a)Throughout the facility maintenance and production employees did not receive training as authorized employees.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by 29 CFR 1910.178(l):     (a) Throughout the establishment, employees operated a Cat C6000 forklift truck without having first completed training consisting of formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Machine Shop- Secondary Department, Clausing Drill Press,  where employees were exposed to amputation and flying metal chip hazards from the rotating drill.    (b) Machine Shop- Secondary Department, Rockwall Drill Press, where employees were exposed to amputation and flying metal chip hazards from the rotating drill.    (c) Machine Shop-CNC Department, Craftsman Drill Press, where employees were exposed to amputation and flying metal chip hazards from the rotating drill.    (d) Machine Shop, Rockwall Delta Vertical Belt Sander, where employees were exposed to  unguarded ingoing and outgoing nip point hazards,  and flying metal chip hazards from the belt sander.     (e) Machine Shop, Baldor Vertical Belt Sander, where employees were exposed to  unguarded ingoing and outgoing nip point hazards,  and flying metal chip hazards from the belt sander.      (f) Machine Shop, Hardinge Machine #1 , where employees were exposed to amputation and flying metal chip hazards from the rotating chuck of the lathe.    (g) Machine Shop, Hardinge Machine #2 , where employees were exposed to amputation and flying metal chip hazards from the rotating chuck of the lathe.    (h)  Machine Shop, Yam horizontal lathe, where employees were exposed to amputation and flying metal chip hazards from the rotating chuck of the lathe.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:    (a) Machine Shop, CNC Department, employees operated a bench grinder with no side guard for the periphery wheel were exposed to amputation and crushed by hazards (left wheel).      (b) Machine Shop, CNC Department, employees operated a bench grinder with no side guard for the periphery wheel were exposed to amputation and crushed by hazards (right wheel).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:   (a) Machine Shop, CNC Department, employees operated a bench grinder work rest with an opening of 1 1/2 inch from wheel (left wheel).    (b) Machine Shop, CNC Department, employees operated a bench grinder work rest with an opening of 1 1/4 inch from wheel (right wheel).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  a) Machine Shop, CNC Department, employees operated a bench grinder with a tongue guard greater then one fourth an inch (left wheel).   (b) Machine Shop, CNC Department, employees operated a bench grinder with a tongue guard greater then one fourth an inch (right wheel).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.217 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,234 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press:     (a) CNC Department, employees who operated the Benchmaster mechanical power press are exposed to amputation hazards. No point of operation guarding was provided by the employer.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3234
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    (a) Outside Curing Oven Area, below the Curing Oven employees were exposed to caught by and amputation hazards while working near the pulley belt wheels.    (b) Machine Shop, Rockwell Delta Vertical Belt Sander, where employees were exposed to caught by and amputation hazards when working near the pulley belt wheels.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o)  (a) Outside Curing Oven Area, below the Curing Oven employees were exposed to caught by and amputation hazards while working near the horizontal pulley belt.  (b) Machine Shop, Delta Rockwall Vertical Belt Sander, where employees were exposed to caught by and amputation hazards when working near the horizontal pulley belt.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:     (a) Machine Shop, CNC department, the breakers of the electrical panel #5 were not labeled. Employees are exposed to electrical shock hazards.    (b) Machine Shop, CNC department, the breakers of the electrical panel #6 were not labeled. Employees are exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2587
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,234 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:    (a) Throughout the machine shop, employees were worked near and using chemicals such as but not limited to: Qualichem Xtreme Cut 251C cutting and grinding solution, grinding and buffering metals (copper, iron oxide, and chromium), Kerosene, Safety Kleen 105 solvent, Safety Kleen Preium solvent, compressed gases (Argon, Propane, Acetylene, Forane-22) which were not included on the chemical list.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3234
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Machine Shop, the employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals for: Qualichem Xtreme Cut 251C cutting and grinding solution, grinding and buffering metals (copper, iron oxide, and chromium), Kerosene, Safety Kleen 105 solvent, Safety Kleen Preium solvent, compressed gases (Argon, Propane, Acetylene, Forane-22).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2018
Abate by
May 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $726 · Current $363 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:     (a) Machine Shop, the employer did not provide basic advisory information on respirators such as but not limited to Maytex (3000B) and other various filtering facepiece (dust mask) respirators. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $363
  • — C (O) $726
  • — Z (O) $726

View Accurate Automatic Manufacturing Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342877867.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.