NEWARK, DE —
OSHA Inspection: LACEY ELECTRIC INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LACEY ELECTRIC INC. in 400 OGLETOWN RD, NEWARK, DE 19711 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 342878709.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LACEY ELECTRIC INC.
- Site address
- 400 OGLETOWN RD
- City
- NEWARK
- State
- DE
- ZIP
- 19711
- Mailing
- 1060 OLD BIRNVILLE ROAD SUITE 100, READING, PA 19605
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B03
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,363 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3): Each employee in a hoist area was not protected from falling 6 feet (1.8m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems: a) 400 Ogletown Rd, Newark, DE - On or about January 15, 2018, the employer failed to protect employees exposed to fall hazards while retrieving materials in a hoist area approximately 40 feet above grade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3363.1
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.503 C
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,141 · Current $2,042 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section: Note: Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where (1) Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete; or (2) Changes in the types of fall protection systems or equipment to be used render previous training obsolete; or Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. a) 400 Ogletown Rd, Newark, DE - On or about January 15, 2018 where the employer previously provided training related to fall hazards and procedures to minimize hazards in certain work areas, the employer failed to retrain employees in the recognition and minimizing fall hazards while working near unprotected wall openings such as hoisting areas. Abatement Note: The training program must enable the employees to recognize the hazards of falling and must train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Each employee must be trained by a competent person in the following: 1. The nature of fall hazards in the work area; 2. The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used; 3. The use and operation of guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used; 4. The role of each employee in the safety monitoring system when this system is used; 5. The limitations on the use of mechanical equipment during the performance of roofing work on low-sloped roofs; 6. The correct procedures for the handling and storage of equipment and materials and the erection of overhead protection; 7. The role of employees in fall protection plans; 8. The standards contained in this subpart. The employer must verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record that will contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2041.65
- — Z (S) $3141
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,363 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): The employer used forklifts to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied: Note: Preamble to Subpart L promulgated new paragraph (c)(2)(iv) & (v) in final rule to provide guidance. Added provision requires that in the case of fork-lifts, the entire scaffold platform be secured to the forklift. a) 400 Ogletown Rd, Newark, DE - On or about January 15, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that an elevated platform (box), on which employees walked to retrieve materials, was attached and secured to the forks of a Caterpillar Telehandler.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3363.1
- — Z (S) $5174
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in DE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342878709.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.