OSHA Inspection: MIRABUX - FRANK DANIELE, INC. JOINT VENTURE

Issued

Feb 20, 2018

Abate by

Feb 28, 2018

Penalty

Initial $1,663 · Current $1,114 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     MCAS Miramar Starbucks Project: A written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented at the jobsite where employees were working with Portland Cement-based mortar and grout products. Employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards.

Issued

Feb 20, 2018

Abate by

Feb 28, 2018

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  MCAS Miramar Starbucks Project: Safety Data Sheets for the Portland Cement-based mortars and grouts were not maintained at the jobsite. Employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards.

Issued

Feb 20, 2018

Abate by

Feb 28, 2018

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   MCAS Miramar Starbucks Project: Training on the hazard communication program, including chemical hazards and maintenance of safety data sheets, was not provided to employees using Portland Cement-based mortar and grout products. Employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards.

Issued

Feb 20, 2018

Abate by

Feb 28, 2018

Penalty

Initial $1,663 · Current $1,114 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact.    MCAS Miramar Starbucks Project trash corral:   a) Employee(s) were working with Portland Cement-based mortar mix without the use of eye protection. Employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards.  b) Employee(s) were working with Portland Cement-based mortar mix without the use of impervious gloves. Employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards.

Issued

Feb 20, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $1,857 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:    MCAS Miramar Starbucks Project trash corral: Rebar protruding 19 inches from the top of the block wall was not protected. Employees were exposed to impalement hazards.