Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED COLLISION CENTER II

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ADVANCED COLLISION CENTER II in 1165 SLEDGE DR, MOBILE, AL 36606 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 342884673.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Collision Center II — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Collision Center II is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1165 SLEDGE DR
City
MOBILE
State
AL
ZIP
36606
Mailing
1165 SLEDGE DR, MOBILE, AL 36606
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    (a) Entire Building: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed his employees to the hazard of being struck-by fragments of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) plastic pipe in the event that the PVC plastic pipe ruptured. PVC plastic piping was used in exposed above ground location to transport compressed air at 170 psi.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    (a) Body shop: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to compressed air hazards in that employees were allowed to use compressed air for cleaning that was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) Body shop: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were allowed to use products that contain hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to lacquer thinner, primer, paint reducer and different types of paints without being provided with a written hazard communications program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a) Body shop: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to hazardous chemicals which were contained in the products the employees used such as but not limited to lacquer thinner, primer, paint reducer and different types of paints; without maintaining in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical and not ensuring that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Body shop: On and about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Body shop: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures for employees required to use tight fitting respirators when spray painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Body shop: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to provide employees required to use tight fitting respirators with medical evaluation for respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    (a) Body shop: On or about January 18, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to fit test employees required to use tight fitting respirators prior to initial use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Advanced Collision Center II's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342884673.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.