DOWNINGTOWN, PA —
OSHA Inspection: HAINES & KIBBLEHOUSE, INC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of HAINES & KIBBLEHOUSE, INC in NEW STATION DOWNINGTOWN JOB 300 BRANDYWINE AVENUE, DOWNINGTOWN, PA 19335 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 342886389.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Haines & Kibblehouse, INC — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Haines & Kibblehouse, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAINES & KIBBLEHOUSE, INC
- Site address
- NEW STATION DOWNINGTOWN JOB 300 BRANDYWINE AVENUE
- City
- DOWNINGTOWN
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19335
- Mailing
- 2060 LUCON RD, SKIPPACK, PA 19474
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 1500
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
18 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $0 Reduced
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, employees were not provided with medical evaluations before being required to wear N95 filtering facepiece air purifying respirators.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7391
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $0 Reduced
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not conduct fit testing for employees required to wear tight-fitting half face air-purifying respirators such as 3M 6000 series with P100 filters and N95 filtering facepiece respirators, while performing demolition activities.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7391
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $7,391
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer permitted employees with facial hair that interfered with the seal to wear tight-fitting half face air-purifying respirators such as 3M 6000 series air purifying respirators and N95 filtering facepiece air purifying respirators, while performing demolition activities.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $7391
- — C (S) $7391
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.134 H01 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $0 Reduced
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, required use of respirators such as 3M 6000 series issued to employees were not maintained in a sanitary condition, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7391
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.134 L01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $0 Reduced
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(l)(1): Evaluations of the workplace were not conducted to ensure the written respiratory protection program was being effectively implemented: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not conduct evaluations to determine if the written respirator protection program was effectively implemented.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7391
- — Z (S) $7391
1926.62 D02 V A
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $5,405
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing cutting and torch burning with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f): (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide, as an interim control, employees with respirators which will protect the employees from exposures to lead up to 2500 ug/m3 (50 times the PEL), exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $5404.54
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 F03 I A
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(3)(i)(A): The employer did not select, and provide to employees, the appropriate respirators as specified in 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A): (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide, as an interim control, employees performing torch cutting on steel coated with lead-based paint with respirators which will protect the employees from exposures to lead up to 2500 ug/m3 (50 times the PEL), exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D01 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,239 · Current $9,239
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA): (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not conduct an initial exposure assessment of employees performing torch burning of steel where lead was present, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9239
- — C (S) $9239
- — Z (S) $9239
1926.62 D01 III
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level: (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, representative of employees exposed to lead while performing work as torch cutters. (b) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, representative of employees exposed to lead while performing work as laborers.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V B
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,239 · Current $9,239
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide employees performing cutting and torch burning with appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g): (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not assure employees used coveralls or similar full-body work clothing, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $9239
- — C (S) $9239
- — Z (S) $9239
1926.62 G01 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(i): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments, such as, but not limited to coveralls or similar full-body work clothing (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not assure employees performing torch cutting of steel with surface coated with lead containing coating used coveralls or similar full-body work clothing, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V C
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing cutting and torch burning with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2): (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide clean change areas as interim protection for employees performing cutting and torch burning of lead coated surfaces, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 I02 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators: (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide clean change areas as interim protection for employees performing cutting and torch burning of lead coated surfaces, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 I02 II
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that change areas were equipped with separate storage facilities for protective work clothing and equipment and for street clothes, that would prevent cross-contamination: (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide clean change areas with separate storage for protective clothing and street clothing as interim protection for employees performing cutting and torch burning of lead coated surfaces, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,239 · Current $9,239
General-duty citation text
1926.503(a)(1) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, an unprotected floor edge exposed employees performing work on the 2nd floor to a fall hazard of approximately 28.5 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $9239
- — C (S) $9239
- — Z (S) $9239
1926.62 D02 V E
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,239 · Current $0 Reduced
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing cutting and torch burning with biological monitoring in accordance with 1926.62(j)(1)(i), to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels: (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide, as an interim control, employees with biological monitoring for exposure to lead, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $9239
- — Z (S) $9239
1926.62 J01 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make available initial medical surveillance, consisting of biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels, to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level: (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide, as an interim control, employees with biological monitoring for exposure to lead, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.352 D
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,543 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.352(d): Suitable fire extinguishing equipment was not immediately available in the work area(s) where welding, cutting, or heating was being performed: (a) River Station Demolition Project, Downingtown, PA - On or about 1/17/18, the employer did not provide a fire extinguisher or other suitable equipment where the torch cutting of steel was being performed in the presence of combustible materials, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5543
- — Z (S) $5543
More inspections at Haines & Kibblehouse, INC
Mar 13, 2025
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Jan 24, 2018
DOWNINGTOWN, PA
May 4, 2007
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Jul 11, 2006
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Nov 17, 2004
WESCOSVILLE, PA
View Haines & Kibblehouse, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
Jul 16, 2026
R M Pacella INC · ATTLEBORO, MA
Jul 16, 2026
WA317992094 - TOP Shelf Cranes INC · BOTHELL, WA
Jul 16, 2026
69335 - Flynn Brothers Contracting INC · LOUISVILLE, KY
Jul 15, 2026
Astech Corporation · CHARLESTON, WV
Jul 14, 2026
American Wrecking INC · LOS ANGELES, CA
More inspections in PA
Jul 17, 2026
FOX Tapping INC. · COLUMBIA, PA
Jul 17, 2026
Columbia Water CO · COLUMBIA, PA
Jul 17, 2026
NEW Enterprise Stone & Lime CO., INC. · WILKES BARRE, PA
Jul 16, 2026
Mukhleen Gernaros Pizza LLC DBA Genaro'S Pizzeria and Steaks · PHILADELPHIA, PA
Jul 16, 2026
Center City Construction and Development, LLC · PHILADELPHIA, PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342886389.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.