Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, INC. in 5920 WEST BAY RD, BAYTOWN, TX 77523 (NAICS 423860). OSHA activity number 342890126.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Industrial Marketing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Industrial Marketing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5920 WEST BAY RD
City
BAYTOWN
State
TX
ZIP
77523
Mailing
5920 WEST BAY RD., BAYTOWN, TX 77523
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423860
Employees
69
Ownership type
A

18 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $11,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  Except as provided elsewhere in the section, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a) In the wash bay, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while an employee was standing on top of tanker trailer 1986 after being directed to open, assess, and clean the internal space of the trailer.    b) In the wash bay, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while an employee was standing on top of tanker trailer 550 after being directed to open, assess, and clean the internal space of the trailer.    c) In the wash bay, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while an employee was standing on top of tanker trailer 1819 after being directed to open, assess, and clean the internal space of the trailer.    d) In the wash bay, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while an employee was standing on top of tanker trailer 1354 after being directed to open, assess, and clean the internal space of the trailer.    e) In the wash bay, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while an employee was standing on top of container SIMU 2609533 after being directed to open, assess, and clean the internal space of the trailer.    f) In the wash bay, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while employees were standing on top of container SIMU-260827-0 while performing a non-entry confined space rescue of another employee.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $11640
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.134 D01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Aug 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a) At the facility in Bay 1, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not identify and estimate the employees' exposure to Polymeric MDI Bulk while opening, assessing, and cleaning tank trailer 1986.   b) At the facility in Bay 3, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not identify and estimate the employees' exposure to MDI while opening, assessing, and cleaning tank trailer 1819.   c) At the facility in Bay 4, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not identify and estimate the employees' exposure to Ortho-Toluenediamine while opening, assessing, and cleaning tank trailer 1354.   d) At the facility in Bay 5, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not identify and estimate the employees' exposure to Cresols while opening, assessing, and cleaning container SIMU2609533.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.146 D05 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Aug 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $11,640
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(i):  Under the permit required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not evaluate permit space conditions when entry operations were conducted by testing conditions in the permit space to determine if acceptable entry conditions existed before entry was authorized to begin:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the internal atmosphere of tanker trailer 1819 was not tested for oxygen, flammable gases and vapors, and other potential toxic air contaminates prior to employees opening, assessing, and cleaning the internal spaces.      b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the internal atmosphere of tanker trailer 1354 was not tested for oxygen, flammable gases and vapors, and other potential toxic air contaminates prior to employees opening, assessing, and cleaning the internal spaces.      c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the internal atmosphere of container SIMU2609533 was not tested for oxygen, flammable gases and vapors, and other potential toxic air contaminates prior to employees opening, assessing, and cleaning the internal spaces.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $11640
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Aug 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4)(i): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not provide, at no cost to the employees, testing and monitoring equipment needed to comply with 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5):  a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not provide equipment to test permit required confined space atmospheres for chemicals such as, but not limited to, polymeric MDI.   b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not provide equipment to test permit required confined space atmospheres for chemicals such as, but not limited to, isoprene.  c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not provide equipment to test permit required confined space atmospheres for chemicals such as, but not limited to, cresols.  d) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not provide equipment to test permit required confined space atmospheres for chemicals such as, but not limited to, ortho-toluenediamine.  e) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not provide equipment to test permit required confined space atmospheres for chemicals such as, but not limited to, desmodur H.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Aug 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $6,467 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:    a) At the facility, where the employer did not implement a change schedule for employees that wore respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6467
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $11,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:    a) At the facility, where the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested annually.  Employees wear respiratory protection while opening, assessing, checking for heel, and washing tanker trailers and containers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $11640
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.140 C18

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Aug 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $11,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.140(c)(18):  Personal fall protection systems was not inspected before initial use during each work shift for mildew, wear, damage, and other deterioration, and defective components were not removed from service:    a) In the tank wash area, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the Rebel Protecta self-retracting lifeline (SRL) was not inspected for deterioration and defective components prior to use.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $11640
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.146 D06

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Aug 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(6): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not provide at least one attendant outside the permit space into which entry was authorized for the duration of entry operations:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that there was at least one attendant outside the permitted space while entry was made into tanker trailer 1986.    b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that there was at least one attendant outside the permitted space while entry was made into tanker trailer 1819.    c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that there was at least one attendant outside the permitted space while entry was made into tanker trailer 1354.    d) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not ensure that there was at least one attendant outside the permitted space while entry was made into tanker trailer SIMU2609533.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.146 D09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): The employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees, and/or for preventing unauthorized entry:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not implement the procedures for rescuing entrants and preventing unauthorized entry into confined spaces.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.146 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(k)(1): An employer who designates rescue and emergency services, pursuant to paragraph (d)(9) of this section did not evaluate the prospective rescuer's ability by the criteria set in this section, (k)(1)(i) - (k)(1)(v):    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the employer did not evaluate the "public emergency services'" ability to provide rescue for confined space entry into tanker trailers and containers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F03

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(3): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the date and the authorized duration of the entry permit:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits did not specify the authorized duration of the entry on the permit for tanker trailer 1819.      b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits did not specify the authorized duration of the entry on the permit for container CXTU-102735-4.     c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits did not specify the authorized duration of the entry on the permit for container SIMU 2609533.     d) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits did not specify the authorized duration of the entry on the permit for tanker trailer 1354.     e) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits did not specify the authorized duration of the entry on the permit for container EXFU-055441-9.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.146 F06

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(6): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the individual, by name, currently serving as entry supervisor, with a space for the signature or initials of the entry supervisor who originally authorized entry:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where confined space permits for tanker trailer 1819 did not identify the current entry supervisor with a space for the signature or initials of the entry supervisor who originally authorized entry.      b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where confined space permits for tanker trailer CXTU-102735-4 did not identify the current entry supervisor with a space for the signature or initials of the entry supervisor who originally authorized entry.      c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where confined space permits for tanker trailer SIMU 2609533 did not identify the current entry supervisor with a space for the signature or initials of the entry supervisor who originally authorized entry.      d) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where confined space permits for tanker trailer 1354 did not identify the current entry supervisor with a space for the signature or initials of the entry supervisor who originally authorized entry.      e) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where confined space permits for container EXFU-055441-9 did not identify the current entry supervisor with a space for the signature or initials of the entry supervisor who originally authorized entry.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F11

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(11): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for tanker trailer 1819 did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services.    b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for container CXTU-102735-4 did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services.    c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for container SIMU 2609533 did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services.     d) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for tanker trailer 1354 did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services.    e) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for container EXFU-055441-9 did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F12

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(12): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for tanker trailer 1819 did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry.    b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for container CXTU-102735-4 did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry.    c) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for container SIMU 2609533 did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry.     d) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for tanker trailer 1354 did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry.    e) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the confined space permits for container EXFU-055441-9    did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F10

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(10): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the results of initial and periodic tests performed under 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5), accompanied by the names or initials of the tester:    a) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the tank wash confined space permits did not specify the name of the person that conducted the initial atmospheric tests for container CXTU-102735-4.      b) At the facility, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the tank wash confined space permits did not specify the name of the person that conducted the initial atmospheric tests for container EXFU-055441-9.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $9,239
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    a) In the tank wash building, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where there was not sufficient space around the electrical panels, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $9239
  • — C (S) $9239
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.307 C03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(3): Equipment was not safe for the location in that it was not of a type and design that the employer demonstrated would provide protection from the hazards arising from the combustibility and flammability of vapors, liquids, gases, dusts, or fibers involved:    a) In the tank wash bay, where the electrical receptacle installed on the working platform of bay 2 was not safe for the classified location.    b) In the tank wash bay, where the electrical receptacle installed on the working platform of bay 3 was not safe for the classified location.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $9239
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2018
Abate by
Jun 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $6,467 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):     a) In the tank wash area, on January 13, 2018, and times prior to, where the safety data sheets were not readily accessible to the employees.  The employees clean tanker trailers and containers that have previously contained chemicals such as, but not limited to, isoprenes, cresols, MDI, TDI, ortho-toluenediamine, and desmodur h.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6467
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

View Industrial Marketing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342890126.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.