WINDHAM, ME —
OSHA Inspection: ALL IN ONE INSULATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALL IN ONE INSULATION in 78 ALBION ROAD, WINDHAM, ME 04062 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 342896651.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALL IN ONE INSULATION
- Site address
- 78 ALBION ROAD
- City
- WINDHAM
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04062
- Mailing
- PO BOX 965, WINDHAM, ME 04062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: Establishment - The employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program for employees required to use 3M full-face fitted respirators when applying spray foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2587.2
- — Z (S) $3696
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Establishment - The employer did not provide medical evaluations prior to employees using required fitted respirators for spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): Establishment - The employer did not ensure employees required to use fitted respirators passed an appropriate fit test prior to using respirators when spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Abate by
- May 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: Site location - An employee was wearing a 3M full-face fitted respirator and had facial hair impeding the seal when spraying foam insulation with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante, and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer: Site - The 3M full-face fitted respirator was not cleaned and disinfected properly when employees use the respirator for spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide to employees required to use respirators, annual and more often if necessary, effective respiratory protection training that was comprehensive and understandable. Establishment - The employer did not provide effective respirator training for employees required to use 3M full-face fitted respirators when spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Establishment - The employer did not create an effective written hazardous communication program which included the following: current information regarding safety data sheets of a uniform format, standard labeling systems to include pictograms, and training requirements for employees that spray foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2587.2
- — Z (S) $3696
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
107313772470T177
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Establishment - Employees were not provided with effective training and information regarding the isocyantes (such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante) used in the workplace including explanation of safety data sheets and how to use the appropriate hazard information.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.32 A
- Issued
- May 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $739 · Current $517 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a): 1904.32(a): Employer did not create, certify and post the OSHA 300A annual summary of injuries and illness: Establishment - The employer did not complete the annual summary (OSHA 300A form or equivalent) for years 2013 through 2017.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $517.3
- — Z (O) $739
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342896651.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.