Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALL IN ONE INSULATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALL IN ONE INSULATION in 78 ALBION ROAD, WINDHAM, ME 04062 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 342896651.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ALL in ONE Insulation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ALL in ONE Insulation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
78 ALBION ROAD
City
WINDHAM
State
ME
ZIP
04062
Mailing
PO BOX 965, WINDHAM, ME 04062
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  Establishment - The employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program for employees required to use 3M full-face fitted respirators when applying spray foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587.2
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Establishment - The employer did not provide medical evaluations prior to employees using required fitted respirators for spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Establishment - The employer did not ensure employees required to use fitted respirators passed an appropriate fit test prior to using respirators when spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  Site location - An employee was wearing a 3M full-face fitted respirator and had facial hair impeding the seal when spraying foam insulation with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante, and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:  Site - The 3M full-face fitted respirator was not cleaned and disinfected properly when employees use the respirator for spraying  foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide to employees required to use respirators, annual and more often if necessary, effective respiratory protection training that was comprehensive and understandable.  Establishment - The employer did not provide effective respirator training for employees required to use 3M full-face fitted respirators when spraying foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Establishment - The employer did not create an effective written hazardous communication program which included the following: current information regarding safety data sheets of a uniform format, standard labeling systems to include pictograms, and training requirements for employees that spray foam insulation containing hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587.2
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 107313772470T177

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Establishment - Employees were not provided with effective training and information regarding the isocyantes (such as but not limited to methylene bisphenyl isocyante, toluene-2, 6-diisocyante,and hexamethylene diisocyante) used in the workplace including explanation of safety data sheets and how to use the appropriate hazard information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.32 A

Other-than-serious 5 instances 13 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $739 · Current $517 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(a): 1904.32(a): Employer did not create, certify and post the OSHA 300A annual summary of injuries and illness:      Establishment - The employer did not complete the annual summary (OSHA 300A form or equivalent) for years 2013 through 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $517.3
  • — Z (O) $739

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342896651.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.