TINLEY PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: MYKOLA TKACHUK
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MYKOLA TKACHUK in 7001 W. 159TH STREET, TINLEY PARK, IL 60477 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342901683.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MYKOLA TKACHUK
- Site address
- 7001 W. 159TH STREET
- City
- TINLEY PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60477
- Mailing
- 2940 N. HARLEM AVE., ELMWOOD PARK, IL 60707
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or about January 25, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program to comply with the regulations of this part which included, but were not limited to employee protection when exposed to falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $1663
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: a. On or about January 25, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was not trained in the recognition of jobsite hazards, which included but not limited to, fall hazards or stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,326 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about January 25, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations, eight (8) feet four (4) inches above the ground, were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3326
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a. On or about January 25, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall protection hazards, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,326 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about January 25, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $3326
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342901683.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.