Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TEXAS DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TEXAS DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. in 13001 ALMEDA RD., HOUSTON, TX 77075 (NAICS 493190). OSHA activity number 342903408.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Texas Distribution Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Texas Distribution Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
13001 ALMEDA RD.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77075
Mailing
13001 ALMEDA RD., HOUSTON, TX 77075
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493190
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,434 · Current $2,660 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a) At the facility, where employees working on blender platforms in excess of four feet were not protected from falling.  b) At the facility, where employees working on the liquid soap tank platforms in excess of four feet were not protected from falling.  c) At the facility, where employees working on the bag machine platforms in excess of four feet were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2660.4
  • · Z (S) $4434

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) At the facility, employees were not medically evaluated prior to using 3M N95 respirators while operating the bagging and blending machines.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1330.2
  • · Z (S) $2217

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) At the facility, where employees using 3M N95 respirators while operating the bagging and blending machines had not been fit tested.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1330.2
  • · Z (S) $2217

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $415 · Current $249 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace with a a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a) At the facility, where the employer did estimate employee exposure to respirable dust while operating the bag machine.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation hazards.  b) At the facility, where the employer did not estimate employee exposure to respirable dust while operating the blending machines.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $249
  • · Z (O) $415

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $415 · Current $249 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a) At the facility, where the employer did not certify that employees had been trained and evaluated to operate the forklifts at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $249
  • · Z (O) $415

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342903408.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.