ELGIN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ARTHUR SCHUMAN MIDWEST, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ARTHUR SCHUMAN MIDWEST, LLC in 2589 TECHNOLOGY DR., ELGIN, IL 60124 (NAICS 311513). OSHA activity number 342903986.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARTHUR SCHUMAN MIDWEST, LLC
- Site address
- 2589 TECHNOLOGY DR.
- City
- ELGIN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60124
- Mailing
- 2589 TECHNOLOGY DR., ELGIN, IL 60124
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311513
- Employees
- 579
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $8,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D): Northwest, tray/slice room, Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters - On or about January 12, 2018, employees assigned to perform servicing and maintenance activities on energized equipment were not provided with adequately developed and documented machine-specific hazardous energy control (lockout tagout) procedures. The procedures lacked specific steps to isolate and control hazardous energy sources, steps for the placement of lockout devices, and specific verifications steps to determine the effectiveness of the energy control measures. Employees engaged in activities such as, but not limited to, cleaning tasks were exposed to machine hazards likely to result in serious injuries due to in-going nip points and shear points. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8400
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $8,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed: Northwest, tray/slice room, Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters - On or about January 12, 2018, the employer did not conduct inspections of their hazardous energy control procedures at least annually to identify and correct any deviations or procedural inadequacies. Employees assigned to perform cleaning activities on the tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters were exposed to machine hazards likely to result in serious injuries due to in-going nip points and shear points. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8400
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $8,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: Northwest, tray/slice room, Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters - On or about January 12, 2018, employees assigned to perform servicing and maintenance activities that required the use of lockout/tagout were not trained on safe application, usage, methods, and means to isolate and control hazardous energy sources. Employees were assigned to perform cleaning activities on the tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters that exposed them to in-going nip points and shear points. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8400
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $8,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): (1) prepare for shut down by recognizing energy hazards and its controls, (2) turn off and shut down the machines, (3) physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source, (4) affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device, (5) render safe all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy, (6) verify that isolation and de-energization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished. (a) Northwest, tray/slice room - On or about January 12, 2018, employees assigned to perform cleaning (servicing) of Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors were exposed to in-going nip points and shear points while hazardous energy controls (lockout) were not done in the sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6). (b) Northwest, tray/slice room, Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters - Employees assigned to perform cleaning and setup during cheese flavor changes, and sanitation (servicing) were exposed to in-going nip points and shear points while hazardous energy controls (lockout) were not done in the sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6). Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8400
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.147 F03 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): When servicing and/or maintenance is performed by a crew, craft, department or other group, they shall utilize a procedure which affords the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device. Northwest, tray/slice room, Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors and ultrasonic cutters - employees assigned to perform servicing and maintenance activities on energized equipment were not provided with group lockout procedures to ensure individual employee's safety. Employees engaged in activities such as, but not limited to, cleaning and sanitation tasks were exposed to machine hazards likely to result in serious injuries due to in-going nip points and shear points. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $8,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees shall be trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertain to their respective job assignments: Entire Facility - The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in and familiar with safety-related work practices, such as the use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment (PPE), insulated tools and insulating and shielding materials necessary to safely accomplish such tasks. Employees were exposed to the hazards of electrocution, electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries. Maintenance employees performed troubleshooting and servicing tasks on electrical components, including changing blown fuses and voltage testing on energized components up to 480V. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8400
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.333 A
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a): "General." Safety-related work practices shall be employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work is performed near or on equipment or circuits which are or may be energized. The specific safety-related work practices shall be consistent with the nature and extent of the associated electrical hazards. Entire Facility - the employer did not ensure that electrical safety-related work practices were employed to prevent electrocution, electrical shock, or other injuries when employees were performing maintenance operations on electrical systems. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while troubleshooting and repairing cheese processing equipment. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $8,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shall be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: Entire Facility - The employer did not ensure that employees used electrical protective equipment for the face, head, hands and body to prevent burns, electrocution, electrical shock, or other injuries when employees were performing maintenance operations on electrical systems. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while troubleshooting and repairing cheese processing equipment. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8400
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $129,336 · Current $84,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc. Northwest, tray/slice room, Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors: (a) tray line conveyor slicer 4, model M03109001, serial no. 35028 026, connecting to tray turn checkweigh conveyor M03063001, serial no. 35028 012; (b) tray line conveyor slicer 3, model M03108001, serial no. 35028 025; (c) tray line conveyor slicer 2, model M03107001, serial no. 35028 024; (d) tray line conveyor slicer 1, model M03106001, serial no. 35028 023; Employees were exposed to in-going nip points and caught-in hazards from unguarded horizontal flat belts and sprocketed drive shafts on the above referenced Marchant Schmidt, Inc. tray line conveyors. Interlocked barrier guards were removed or otherwise bypassed for production purposes, exposing employees to serious injury in the event they inadvertently contacted the danger zone associated with the operating tray line conveyor belts. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $84200
- — Z (W) $129336
1904.31 B03
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,848 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.31(b)(3): If an employee in my establishment is a contractor's employee, must I record an injury or illness occurring to that employee? If the contractor's employee is under the day-to-day supervision of the contractor, the contractor is responsible for recording the injury or illness. If you supervise the contractor employee's work on a day-to-day basis, you must record the injury or illness. On or about January 12, 2018, the host employer's management representatives exercised day-to-day supervision of temporary staffing agencies' personnel in the workplace and failed to record injuries sustained by these workers on the host establishment's OSHA Form 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1100
- — Z (O) $1848
More inspections at Arthur Schuman Midwest, LLC
View Arthur Schuman Midwest, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311513)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342903986.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.