ATLANTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: RAMADA PLAZA DOWNTOWN CAPITOL PARK
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAMADA PLAZA DOWNTOWN CAPITOL PARK in 450 CAPITAL AVENUE, ATLANTA, GA 30312 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 342905114.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAMADA PLAZA DOWNTOWN CAPITOL PARK
- Site address
- 450 CAPITAL AVENUE
- City
- ATLANTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30312
- Mailing
- 450 CAPITAL AVENUE, ATLANTA, GA 30312
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 54
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2018
- Abate by
- May 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Throughout the establishment: On or about January 30, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to a chemical hazard, in that personal protective equipment is not provided for employees using chemicals, such as but not limited to, Ecolab Heavy Duty Alkaline Bathroom Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880.2
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2018
- Abate by
- May 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use a) Laundry area: On or about January 30, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to a chemical hazard, in that an emergency eyewash station was not provided for employees working with corrosive materials, such as but not limited to, Ecolab Heavy Duty Alkaline Bathroom Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880.2
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2018
- Abate by
- May 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following: a) Throughout establishment: On or about January 30, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards, in that a written hazard communication program was not established or implemented for employees using chemicals, such as but not limited to, Zinnser Mold Killing primer, Ecolab Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner, Ecolab Glass Cleaner, and Ecolab Heavy Duty Alkaline Bathroom Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2018
- Abate by
- May 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a) Throughout the establishment: On or around February 14, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to a breathing hazard, in that the information included in the Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard was not provided for employees voluntarily wearing a SAS N-95 respiratory face mask.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342905114.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.