Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAMADA PLAZA DOWNTOWN CAPITOL PARK

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAMADA PLAZA DOWNTOWN CAPITOL PARK in 450 CAPITAL AVENUE, ATLANTA, GA 30312 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 342905114.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ramada Plaza Downtown Capitol Park — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ramada Plaza Downtown Capitol Park is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
450 CAPITAL AVENUE
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30312
Mailing
450 CAPITAL AVENUE, ATLANTA, GA 30312
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
54
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2018
Abate by
May 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) Throughout the establishment:  On or about January 30, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to a chemical hazard, in that personal protective equipment is not provided for employees using chemicals, such as but not limited to, Ecolab Heavy Duty Alkaline Bathroom Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2018
Abate by
May 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use  a) Laundry area: On or about January 30, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to a chemical hazard, in that an emergency eyewash station was not provided for employees working with corrosive materials, such as but not limited to, Ecolab Heavy Duty Alkaline Bathroom Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2018
Abate by
May 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:  a) Throughout establishment:  On or about January 30, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards, in that a written hazard communication program was not established or implemented for employees using chemicals, such as but not limited to, Zinnser Mold Killing primer, Ecolab Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner, Ecolab Glass Cleaner,  and Ecolab Heavy Duty Alkaline Bathroom Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2328
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2018
Abate by
May 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a) Throughout the establishment: On or around February 14, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to a breathing hazard, in that the information included in the Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard was not provided for employees voluntarily wearing a SAS N-95 respiratory face mask.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342905114.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.