Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DAVID ACEVEDO GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVID ACEVEDO GARCIA in 2812 OAKRIDGE, LUBBOCK, TX 79415 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342905627.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch David Acevedo Garcia for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David Acevedo Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2812 OAKRIDGE
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79415
Mailing
3115 JARVIS, LUBBOCK, TX 79415
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2018
Abate by
Mar 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.   Employees engaged in framing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1663

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2018
Abate by
Mar 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $3,326
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure.  Employees engaged in residential framing work were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3326

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342905627.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.