Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATLAS POWDER COATING

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ATLAS POWDER COATING in 201 EAGLE DR., DENTON, TX 76201 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 342909769.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atlas Powder Coating — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atlas Powder Coating is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
201 EAGLE DR.
City
DENTON
State
TX
ZIP
76201
Mailing
201 EAGLE DR., DENTON, TX 76201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    A written respiratory protection program was not established for employees wearing 3M full face air purifying and NOVA 2000 supplied air respirators during abrasive blasting and powder coating operations were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1850
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  In the production area, employees wearing 3M full face air purifying and NOVA 2000 supplied air respirators during abrasive blasting and powder coating operations were not medical evaluated prior to initial use of the respirator were exposed to physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:   In the production area, employees wearing 3M full face air purifying respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter were exposed to respirable dust hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that compressors used to supply breathing air to respirators were constructed and situated so as to have a tag maintained at the compressor containing the most recent change date and the signature of the person authorized by the employer to perform the change:  In the abrasive blasting area, the compressor used to supply air to respirators did not have a tag maintained at the compressor. The employee was potentially exposed to respiratory and physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(7): Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both:  In the abrasive blasting area, the compressor used to supply air to respirators did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm. The employee was potentially exposed to respiratory and physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of particulates not otherwise regulated, respirable fraction, listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of  5 milligram per cubic meter of air, as an 8-hour time-weighted average:    Employees were exposed to respirable dust while abrasive blasting at an 8-hour TWA of 45.08 mg/m3, approximately 9 times the permissible exposure limit of 5 mg/m3. The exposure was derived from one sample collected over 349 minutes, zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 131 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  Employees were exposed to respirable dust while abrasive blasting at an 8-hour TWA of 45.08 mg/m3, approximately 9 times the permissible exposure limit of 5 mg/m3 without engineering controls. The exposure was derived from one sample collected over 349 minutes, zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 131 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following.         a)  The employer did not develope a written hazard communication program for employees performing abrasive blasting and powder coating with material, such as, but not limited to carbon black, barium sulfate, silicon dioxide, sodium oxide were potentially exposed to skin and respiratory inhalation hazards.          b)  The employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees performing injection molding, cleaning and maintenance operations with material, such as, but not limited to carbon black, barium sulfate, silicon dioxide, sodium oxide were potentially exposed to skin and respiratory inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3326

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    The employer did not certify a workplace hazard assessment for employees required to wear respirators and personal protective equipment.  Employees were exposed to respiratory and skin hazards while powder coating and abrasive blasting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $150
  • — Z (O) $311

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342909769.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.