SPRING, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RICKY MADRID
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICKY MADRID in 3332 SPRING STUEBNER RD., SPRING, TX 77389 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342922226.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICKY MADRID
- Site address
- 3332 SPRING STUEBNER RD.
- City
- SPRING
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77389
- Mailing
- 21523 SPRING CREEK CIRCLE, HUMBLE, TX 77338
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. On or about February 1, 2018 an employee was exposed to a fall hazard when climbing the scaffold frame to access the working level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about February 1, 2018 where an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of more than 10 feet while working from a tubular welded frame scaffold without the use of guardrail systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: On or about February 1, 2018, at the construction site where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when they were permitted to work on a tubular welded scaffold that did not have cross braces on the inside section.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about February 1, 2018, where an employee was using chemicals such as but not limited to, latex paint and acrylic sealant, without a written hazard communication program in place.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1663
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about February 1, 2018, where an employee was using chemicals such as but not limited to exterior latex paint and an acrylic sealant and had not been trained on the hazards of the chemicals they use.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about February 1, 2018, where an employee did not have a safety data sheet for the chemicals in use such as but not limited to exterior latex paint and an acrylic sealant.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: On or about February 1, 2018, at the work site where an employee used a Graco airless paint sprayer with a missing grounding prong.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342922226.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.