Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: STRAIGHT SHOOTER GALLERY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of STRAIGHT SHOOTER GALLERY, LLC in 560 BEECHCRAFT LANE, CRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60012 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 342926979.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Straight Shooter Gallery, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Straight Shooter Gallery, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
560 BEECHCRAFT LANE
City
CRYSTAL LAKE
State
IL
ZIP
60012
Mailing
560 BEECHCRAFT LANE, CRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60012
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713990
Employees
19
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about January 30, 2018, the employer required employees to wear 3M respirators, model 8233, while performing cleaning activities and the employer had not implemented a written respiratory protection program.   No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1551.9
  • · Z (S) $2217

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Abate by
Aug 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about January 30, 2018, the employer required employees to wear 3M respirators, model 8233, while performing cleaning activities.  The employer had not provided medical evaluations to employees prior to the use of a respirator to determine the employee's ability to wear a respirator.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Abate by
Aug 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about January 30, 2018, the employer required employees to wear 3M respirators, model 8233, while performing cleaning activities and the employer had not fit tested employees prior to the use of a respirator to reduce or eliminate respiratory difficulties.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Abate by
Aug 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On or about January 30, 2018, the employer required employees to wear 3M respirators, model 8233, while performing cleaning activities.  The employees were wearing facial hair, which did not allow a tight-fitting seal and could create an interference with the seal.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1551.9
  • · Z (S) $2217

1910.1025 H01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Abate by
Jul 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $2,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces shall be maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:  On or about January 30, 2018, employees were exposed to lead on the following surfaces while cleaning the range and rental firearms and the employer did not ensure all surfaces were maintained as free as practicable from the accumulation of lead to less than 200 micrograms per square foot:  a) Left side of the sales counter was 227 micrograms per square foot. b) Center of the sales counter was 207 micrograms per square foot. c) Right side of the sales counter was 266 micrograms per square foot. d) Men's bathroom door was 210 micrograms per square foot.   Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2069.2
  • · Z (S) $2956

1910.1025 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Abate by
Aug 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025:  On or about January 30, 2018, employees were exposed to lead while cleaning the range and rental firearms and the employer did not provide training on the safety and health hazards associated with lead to prevent or eliminate employee exposures.   Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1551.9
  • · Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  On or about January 30, 2018, employees were required to work with chemicals such as, cleaning solvent and gun oil, while cleaning rental firearms and the employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 19, 2018
Abate by
Aug 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about January 30, 2018, employees were required to work with chemicals such as, cleaning solvent and gun oil, while cleaning rental firearms and the employer had not trained employees on the hazards associated with the chemicals to prevent or reduce exposure.   Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342926979.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.