Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MICKEY BRADFORDS PAINT & BODY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MICKEY BRADFORDS PAINT & BODY, INC. in 101 NORTH SCHILLINGER RD, MOBILE, AL 36608 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 342930922.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mickey Bradfords Paint & Body, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mickey Bradfords Paint & Body, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
101 NORTH SCHILLINGER RD
City
MOBILE
State
AL
ZIP
36608
Mailing
101 NORTH SCHILLINGER RD, MOBILE, AL 36608
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  (a) Painting area: On or about February 6, 2018, and times prior the employer exposed employees to fire hazards by failing to ensure that unused openings in the electrical panel box were effectively closed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Painting area: On or about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were allowed to use products that contain hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to lacquer thinners, primers, paint reducers, paint hardeners and different types of paints without being provided with a written hazard communications program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Painting area: On and about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Painting area: On or about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures for employees required to use tight fitting respirators when spray painting.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Painting area: On or about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to provide employees required to use tight fitting respirators with medical evaluation for respirator use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Painting area: On or about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to fit test employees required to use tight fitting respirators prior to initial use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  (a) Painting area: On or about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer failed to provide employees required to wear half face tight fitting negative pressure respirators during spray painting tasks with comprehensive, understandable training annually.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  (a) Body shop: On or about February 6, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer did not provide employees wearing respirators voluntarily with basic advisory information on respirators as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Mickey Bradfords Paint & Body, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342930922.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.