Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WHITEWATER BOAT CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WHITEWATER BOAT CORPORATION in 280 NW 73RD STREET, MIAMI, FL 33150 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 342932670.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Whitewater Boat Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Whitewater Boat Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
280 NW 73RD STREET
City
MIAMI
State
FL
ZIP
33150
Mailing
280 NW 73RD STREET, MIAMI, FL 33150
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:   On or about 2/7/2018 at the address jobsite above, a Rockwell table saw was not guarded, exposing the employees to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
Apr 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $1,996 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not implement and/or developed a written hazard communication program that included the chemicals used on-site such as but not limited to acetone, and gel coat.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1995.6
  • — Z (S) $3326

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  Instances: 1) On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite carpentry department, the acetone container was not labeled with the identity of the chemical contained therein.  2) On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite building 240, the resin container was not labeled with the identity of the chemical contained therein.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
Apr 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  On or about 2/7/2018, at the above jobsite address, the safety data sheets (SDS)  for chemicals such as but not limited to gel coat, and acetone were not kept in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
Apr 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide training on the hazardous chemicals used on-site such as but not limited to acetone, and gel coat.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  On or about 2/7/2018 at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide employees, who voluntarily wore a 3m air purifying respirator with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $187 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide a copy of the appendix D to those employees who voluntarily wore a filtering facepiece and/or air purifying respirator while working at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $186.6
  • — Z (O) $311

View Whitewater Boat Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342932670.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.