MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: WHITEWATER BOAT CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WHITEWATER BOAT CORPORATION in 280 NW 73RD STREET, MIAMI, FL 33150 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 342932670.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WHITEWATER BOAT CORPORATION
- Site address
- 280 NW 73RD STREET
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33150
- Mailing
- 280 NW 73RD STREET, MIAMI, FL 33150
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336612
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut: On or about 2/7/2018 at the address jobsite above, a Rockwell table saw was not guarded, exposing the employees to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1663.2
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,326 · Current $1,996 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not implement and/or developed a written hazard communication program that included the chemicals used on-site such as but not limited to acetone, and gel coat.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1995.6
- — Z (S) $3326
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: Instances: 1) On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite carpentry department, the acetone container was not labeled with the identity of the chemical contained therein. 2) On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite building 240, the resin container was not labeled with the identity of the chemical contained therein.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): On or about 2/7/2018, at the above jobsite address, the safety data sheets (SDS) for chemicals such as but not limited to gel coat, and acetone were not kept in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide training on the hazardous chemicals used on-site such as but not limited to acetone, and gel coat.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- May 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: On or about 2/7/2018 at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide employees, who voluntarily wore a 3m air purifying respirator with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2018
- Abate by
- May 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $187 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about 2/7/2018, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide a copy of the appendix D to those employees who voluntarily wore a filtering facepiece and/or air purifying respirator while working at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $186.6
- — Z (O) $311
More inspections at Whitewater Boat Corporation
View Whitewater Boat Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336612)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342932670.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.