Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VERDE WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VERDE WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC in 2190 WASHINGTON AVE, ALVIN, TX 77511 (NAICS 562112). OSHA activity number 342937141.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Verde Water Solutions, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Verde Water Solutions, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2190 WASHINGTON AVE
City
ALVIN
State
TX
ZIP
77511
Mailing
5700 SW 45TH AVE, AMARILLO, TX 79109
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562112
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,760 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:     a) At the facility, where the employer did not identify and evaluate the airborne concentrations of sulfuric acid and other acids stored at the facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $7760
  • — Z (S) $7760

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) At the facility, where the employer did not provide medical evaluations to the employees prior to the use of North full face respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1800
  • — C (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a) At the facility, where the employer did not fit test the employees prior to the use of North full face respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $5174
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) At the facility, where the employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program at the site.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1800
  • — C (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  a) At the facility, where the employer did not maintain safety data sheets (SDSs) for chemicals such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acids (98%), sodium carbonate, ferric chloride solutions, and SuperSAS.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:  a) At the facility, where the employer did not develop and train employees on the decontamination procedures for individuals that handled plastic totes that contained sulfuric acid.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2018
Abate by
Aug 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $726 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):  An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a) At the facility, where the employer did not evaluate the forklift operator's performance on the Caterpillar Forklift TC60D at least once every three years.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $400
  • — C (O) $726
  • — Z (O) $726

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342937141.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.