Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LITTLETON CONTRACTORS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LITTLETON CONTRACTORS, LLC in 670 WEST DEKALB PIKE EDDIE V'S CONSTRUCTION SITE, KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342937281.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Littleton Contractors, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Littleton Contractors, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
670 WEST DEKALB PIKE EDDIE V'S CONSTRUCTION SITE
City
KING OF PRUSSIA
State
PA
ZIP
19406
Mailing
9 RIVER ROAD, CONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,513 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.    a) Biljax / Haulotte  Scaffold - On or about February 8, 2018, employees working around and within a fabricated frame scaffold used by employees to construct a block masonry were not wearing protective headgear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2513

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toe boards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.  a) Biljax / Haulotte  Scaffold - On or about February 8, 2018, a fabricated frame scaffold used by employees to construct a block masonry wall did not have toe boards, screens, or other measures to contain or deflect masonry tools and concrete blocks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Abate by
May 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,885 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    a) Biljax / Haulotte  Scaffold - On or about February 8, 2018, a fabricated frame scaffold used by employees to construct a block masonry wall had posts that did not bear on base plates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $1885

1926.451 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Abate by
May 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement:  a) Biljax / Haulotte  Scaffold - On or about February 8, 2018, a fabricated frame scaffold used by employees to construct a block masonry wall had one section of end frames that were not braced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Abate by
May 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,885 · Current $1,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.    a) Concrete block cutting  - On or about February 6, 2018, an employee cutting portions of concrete block with a Husqvarna brand handheld power saw was not protected from respirable crystalline silica hazards by the use of engineering controls or respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $1885

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Abate by
May 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  a) Concrete block cutting  - On or about February 6, 2018, the employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan to cover hazards associated with an employee cutting portions of concrete block with a Husqvarna brand handheld power saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Abate by
May 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200), and did not ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of crystalline silica and safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraph (i)(2) of this section to ensure that hazards associated with cancer, lung effects, immune system effects, and kidney effects are addressed:  a) Concrete block cutting  - On or about February 6, 2018, the employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200) and did not ensure employees were trained in accordance with the Hazard Communication Standard and paragraph (i)(2) of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):  a) JLG Brand Tele-handler - On or about February 6, 2018 the employer did not certify that employees had been trained and evaluated to operate the powered industrial vehicle to move and position pallets of concrete block.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342937281.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.