FORT LAUDERDALE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: K. D. CONSTRUCTION OF FLORIDA, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of K. D. CONSTRUCTION OF FLORIDA, INC. in 120 NE 4TH STREET THE WHITNEY (ONE20FOURTH), FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 342943438.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- K. D. CONSTRUCTION OF FLORIDA, INC.
- Site address
- 120 NE 4TH STREET THE WHITNEY (ONE20FOURTH)
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33301
- Mailing
- 1831 SW 7TH AVENUE, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 300
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: On or about January 12, 2018, at 120 NE 4th Street, The Whitney, (one20fourth), FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, 33301, employees were operating, assembling, dissembling and moving two-point suspended scaffolds without training by a Competent Person, so as to enable the employees to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person: On or about January 12, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold, for the purpose of applying stucco, paint and water proofing to all four exterior walls of a new high-rise apartment building, during which the scaffold and scaffold components had not been erected, moved, dismantled and altered by trained and experienced employees, while under the supervision and direction of a Competent Person, and who was a qualified person in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration, and wherein the scaffold system was observed to have several safety deficiencies; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 II
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system: On or about January 12, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold, for the purpose of applying stucco, paint and water proofing to all four exterior walls of a new high-rise apartment building, during which the employees were not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: On or about January 12, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold, for the purpose of applying stucco, paint and water proofing to all four exterior walls of a new high-rise apartment building, while wearing a PFAS, wherein the system was rigged such that during a fall, the employees may free fall more than 6 feet and/or the system was rigged such that the employee would have contacted the lower level; therefore exposing the employees to fall hazards. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1926.502 D20
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,037 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(20): The employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a fall or did not assure that employees were able to rescue themselves: On or about January 12, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold, for the purpose of applying stucco, paint and water proofing to all four exterior walls of a new high-rise apartment building, while wearing a PFAS, during which the employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a suspended-fall, nor did the employer assure that employees were able to rescue themselves in the event of a suspended-fall; therefore exposing the employees to fall hazards and post-fall injuries resulting from a fall. NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (O) $1037
- — Z (O) $1037
More inspections at K. D. Construction of Florida, INC.
View K. D. Construction of Florida, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342943438.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.