DALLAS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FUNEZ BROTHERS COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FUNEZ BROTHERS COMPANY in 7575 CHAUCER PLACE, DALLAS, TX 75237 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342945409.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FUNEZ BROTHERS COMPANY
- Site address
- 7575 CHAUCER PLACE
- City
- DALLAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75237
- Mailing
- 710 DARNEL, MESQUITE, TX 75149
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working in areas where overhead hazards existed without the use of head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1848
- — Z (S) $3696
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential construction site where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using pneumatic nail guns to secure shingles without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1848
- — Z (S) $3696
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502: a) On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential home, where employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than six (6) feet while performing roofing activities without the use of a guardrail system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a) On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential site, where employees were exposed to fall hazards while using an extension ladder that did not extend at least three (3) feet above the landing and was not equipped with a grab rail.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3696
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342945409.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.