BRONX, NY —
OSHA Inspection: CLAY AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CLAY AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC in 1065 CLAY AVENUE, BRONX, NY 10456 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 342947108.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLAY AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
- Site address
- 1065 CLAY AVENUE
- City
- BRONX
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10456
- Mailing
- 32 MURDOCK STREET, HUNTINGTON STATION, NY 11746
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,357 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: On or about February 8, 2018; Location: 3rd floor 1) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards by having multiple extension cords plugged to an electric metal box hanging, unsecured and not used in accordance with the instructions in the listing and labeling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1357
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,372 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites: On or about February 8, 2018; Location: Inside the building, through all floors 1) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while engaged in construction activities using equipment, such as grinders and extension cords, connected to a non-GFCI source through the entire building. Employer did not provide GFCI devices or other protections as alternate method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2372
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.405 A02 II E
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,357 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): All lamps for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage: On or about February 8, 2018; Location: Stairway 1) Employees were exposed to unprotected temporary lighting hanging from the ceiling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1357
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.50 G
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,357 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.50(g): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Location: New concrete stairway between basement and first floor a) Employees mixing and applying Portland cement while working on the foundation to install a concrete stairway. The employer did not provide an eye wash station for immediate emergency use; on or about 5/1/18.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1357
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,357 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): Location: New concrete stairway between basement and first floor a) Employees using hazardous chemicals such as Portland cement to construct a concrete stairway. The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program; on or about 5/1/18.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1357
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): Location: New concrete stairway between basement and first floor a) Employees working with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to concrete, while working on the foundation for a new concrete stairway. The employer did not maintain Safety Data Sheets at the work site; on or about 5/1/18.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Location: New concrete stairway between basement and first floor a) Employees using hazardous chemicals such as Portland cement when installing new concrete stairway. The employer did not provide hazard communication training; on or about 5/1/18
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA: On or about February 8, 2018, Location: St. Barnabas Hospital; 1) Employer failed to report within 24 hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one employee, as a result of an incident on the jobsite during his work shift. Employer reported hospitalization to OSHA on February 12, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $2772
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342947108.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.