Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IDEAS RESTORATION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of IDEAS RESTORATION INC. in 10 BOSTON POST ROAD, GUILFORD, CT 06437 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342954492.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ideas Restoration INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ideas Restoration INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 BOSTON POST ROAD
City
GUILFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06437
Mailing
1338 DIXWELL AVE, HAMDEN, CT 06514
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $2,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels and 50-feet (15.25 m) wide or less, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net system.  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that each employee who was exposed fall hazards of up to 15 feet 5 inches above the ground while re-roofing a 4-pitch roof was protected by the use of appropriate fall protection systems/devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2069.2
  • — Z (S) $2956

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  Jobsite:  The employer did not verify through a written certification that employees were appropriately trained in fall hazards
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).  Jobsite: The extension ladder used by the employees to gain access to the roof of the building under construction was not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top supports to the feet of the ladder was approximately one--quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587.2
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder with more than one support attachment were not placed with the two rails supported equally:  Jobsite:  The tops of the extension ladder used by the employees to gain access to the roof of the building under construction were not supported equally onto the surface in which it was attached.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Jobsite: The employees using the extension ladder to access the roof were not trained in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Ideas Restoration INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342954492.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.