CENTERBROOK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INCORPORATED in 85 WESTBROOK ROAD, CENTERBROOK, CT 06409 (NAICS 325199). OSHA activity number 342956547.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 85 WESTBROOK ROAD
- City
- CENTERBROOK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06409
- Mailing
- 85 WESTBROOK ROAD, CENTERBROOK, CT 06409
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325199
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,881 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Facility : The employer did not have an established and implemented written respiratory protection program for each employee required to wear tight-fitting respirators while working with hazardous and/or toxic chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3881
1910.134 K05
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5): Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually: Facility: The employer did not conduct respiratory protection retraining on an annual basis for each employee required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: Facility: Each employee wearing respirators were not fit tested on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: Facility: Employees wearing respirators had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator and the face or that interfered with valve function.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1048 D02
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2): The employer did not identify all employees who may have been exposed at or above the action level or at or above the short-term explosure limit (STEL) and accurately determine the exposure of each employee so identified. Facility: Where employees use formaldehyde in a variety of processes such as (but not limited to) during production, scale up and other similar stages in the development of a final product, the employer did not identify all employees who may be exposed at or above the action level or at or above the STEL and accurately determine the exposure of each employee so identified.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.1048 N01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program: Facility: The employer did not assure each employee assigned to workplaces where there is exposure to formaldehyde participated in a formaldehyde training program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 M02 I C
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(i)(C): The employer did not establish a record of the qualitative and quantitative fit tests administered to an employee which included the specific make, model, style and size of respirator tested: Facility: The employer's records of the qualitative fit tests did not include the size of the respirator tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325199)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342956547.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.