BRUNSWICK, GA —
OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO AGUSTIN
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FERNANDO AGUSTIN in 213 BELMONT CIRCLE LOT 105, BRUNSWICK, GA 31525 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342961257.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FERNANDO AGUSTIN
- Site address
- 213 BELMONT CIRCLE LOT 105
- City
- BRUNSWICK
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31525
- Mailing
- 560 NORTH BROAD STREET, MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a). At the worksite - On or about February 15, 2018, an employee operated a Hitachi pneumatic nail gun without the use of eye protection, thus exposing the employee to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). a). At the worksite - On or about February 15, 2018, an employee worked from the structure's top plate without the use of a fall protection system in place, thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 9.3 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Mar 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. a). At the worksite - On or about February 15, 2018, employees used the top cap and top step of a Louisville and a Werner fiberglass stepladder, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 7.4 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342961257.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.