HAMPTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: ESTEFANY RIVERA AND JOSE HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESTEFANY RIVERA AND JOSE HERNANDEZ in 11 LAFAYETTE ROAD, HAMPTON, NH 03842 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342969219.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESTEFANY RIVERA AND JOSE HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 11 LAFAYETTE ROAD
- City
- HAMPTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03842
- Mailing
- 26 GARDNER STREET APT. 2, WORCESTER, MA 01610
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer failed to provide for frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1663
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,362 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Site- Employees were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where the employer did not ensure that head protection was worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2362
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- An employee operating a pneumatic nail gun was not protected from a struck by hazard where the employer did not provide eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Site- Employees working from the exterior top plate and floor trusses were exposed to falls between approximately 10 and 12 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3040
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards while working from the exterior top plate and floor trusses were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: Site- Employees working from the exterior top plate and floor trusses were exposed to a fall where an 8 foot step ladder was provided to access the elevated work area and employees were stepping on the top of the step ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2772
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342969219.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.